2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2016.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homogeneous affine surfaces: Moduli spaces

Abstract: Abstract. We analyze the moduli space of non-flat homogeneous affine connections on surfaces. For Type A surfaces, we write down complete sets of invariants that determine the local isomorphism type depending on the rank of the Ricci tensor and examine the structure of the associated moduli space. For Type B surfaces which are not Type A we show the corresponding moduli space is a simply connected real analytic 4-dimensional manifold with second Betti number equal to 1.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We say that two Type A surface models are linearly isomorphic if there exists T ∈ GL(2, R) intertwining the two structures. One has (see Lemma 2.1 in [5]) the following result. Remark 2.3.…”
Section: Linear Versus Affine Equivalence Let M Be a Typementioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We say that two Type A surface models are linearly isomorphic if there exists T ∈ GL(2, R) intertwining the two structures. One has (see Lemma 2.1 in [5]) the following result. Remark 2.3.…”
Section: Linear Versus Affine Equivalence Let M Be a Typementioning
confidence: 94%
“…The remaining cases correspond to the generic situation where dim{K(M)} = 2. As we wish to describe the eigenspaces E(µ, ∇) very explicitly, we shall proceed rather combinatorially and rely on previous results [4,5,8] concerning different models for homogeneous affine surfaces.…”
Section: Homogeneous Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now turn to the question of invariants and, for the sake of completeness, present some results from M. Brozos-Vázquez et al [6]. We work in the torsion free setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…for different values of the parameters involved; for example, we may interchange the coordinates x 1 ↔ x 2 to see that M 2 1 (a 1 , a 2 ) is linearly equivalent to M 2 1 (a 2 , a 1 ). Giving a precise description of the identifications describing the relevant moduli spaces is somewhat difficult and we refer for [4,9] for further details as it will play no role here. The notation is chosen so that dim{K(M j i (·))} = j.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%