2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00704-011-0485-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homogeneity assessment of a station climate series (1933–2005) in the Metropolitan Area of São Paulo: instruments change and urbanization effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
18
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Por exemplo, a ocorrência de um total de precipitação de 1000 mm ao longo de 24 horas. Sugahara et al (2011) …”
Section: Controle De Qualidade Dos Dados De Precipitaçãounclassified
“…Por exemplo, a ocorrência de um total de precipitação de 1000 mm ao longo de 24 horas. Sugahara et al (2011) …”
Section: Controle De Qualidade Dos Dados De Precipitaçãounclassified
“…Sugahara et al . () pointed out that this instrumentation change affected the temperature and precipitation time series.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The sea breeze frontal passage was analysed using wind direction data from the Meteorological Station of the Institute of Astronomy, Geophysics and Atmospheric Sciences (IAG) of the USP, located in the city of São Paulo, Brazil (Figure ). The station has been keeping records continuously since 1933 and many authors (Pereira Filho et al ., ; Sugahara et al ., ; Silva Dias et al ., ) have extensively used its data. However, it is important to notice that a change of instrumentation in the IAG Meteorological Station (MS/IAG) occurred in 1958 (documented by Pereira Filho et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His results show that Caussinus–Mestre (CauME) method and MASH are the most powerful techniques in identifying and correcting inhomogeneties in meteorological series. Sugahara et al () evaluate the effect of the replacement of instruments and of urbanization on meteorological data. They use the F ‐test for structural breaks (multiple breaks linear regression model), SNHT and Bayesian technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Bayesian test to find inhomogeneities can be seen in the studies of Ducre‐Robitaille et al () and Sugahara et al (). The F ‐test for structural breaks (Sugahara et al , ), ADF unit root test and KPSS stationarity test are not commonly used in homogeneity detection analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%