1978
DOI: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1978.tb06102.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homoeologous Chromosome Pairing and Restricted Segregation in the Fern Ceratopteris

Abstract: The segregation of a marker characterized by pale green gametophytes was monitored within an inbreeding study of the polyploid fern Ceratopteris . Although all of the sporophytes showing segregation were derived from the self-fertilization of haploid garnetophytes, a low overall frequency of 2.5% pale gametophytes was observed in the F:rF,; generations. A model based upon a duplicated locus and homoeologous chromosome pairing can explain the segregational behavior within the study. The overall level of homoeol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As sensitivity towards AGs limits the ability to form bisexual gametophytes, polyploids might be more likely to abandon the use of AGs. That way, each polyploid gametophyte can self‐fertilize and take advantage of their inherent genetic diversity (Hickok, 1978). However, the ratio of responsive diploids and polyploids is nearly identical (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As sensitivity towards AGs limits the ability to form bisexual gametophytes, polyploids might be more likely to abandon the use of AGs. That way, each polyploid gametophyte can self‐fertilize and take advantage of their inherent genetic diversity (Hickok, 1978). However, the ratio of responsive diploids and polyploids is nearly identical (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theory, some fern species may gain very little but lose a lot by responding to AGs. For example, neopolyploid species ( sensu Vida, 1976; herein after referred to as polyploid), having more than two sets of chromosomes and therefore the potential to ‘buffer’ against the deleterious effects of gametophytic selfing, may reproduce by self‐fertilization and still retain genetic variation (Klekowski & Baker, 1966; Hickok, 1978). So, polyploids should tend to self‐fertilize more than diploids (Masuyama, 1979; Soltis & Soltis, 2000; Sessa et al ., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cytological determination of the inheritance pattern (the chromosome pairing behavior) for tetraploid chokecherry is difficult due to its small chromosome size. Allotetraploids have similar inheritance as diploids and are easier to achieve accurate genetic mapping vs. autotetraploids; however, many tetraploid species have intermediate inheritance in which some chromosomes have diverged enough to preferentially pair, while others are similar enough to have levels of random pairing during meiosis (Hickok, 1978a , b ; Stift et al, 2008 ; Koning-Boucoiran et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual sporophytes whose gametophytes exhibit differential genetic load may be considered heterozygous and therefore, to have originated by cross-fertilization between two genetically dissimilar gametophytes (intergametophytic mating). Alternatively, they may be homozygous and express interlocus heterozygosity in duplicated loci via homoeologous chromosome pairing; a phenomenon documented in C. thalictroides by Hickok & Klekowski (1974) and Hickok (1978). Sporophytes lacking genetic variability are considered to be homozygous and to have resulted from inbreeding (Klekowksi, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%