ular injections of leucine are sufficient to suppress food intake, but it remains unclear whether brain leucine signaling represents a physiological signal of protein balance. We tested whether variations in dietary and circulating levels of leucine, or all three branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), contribute to the detection of reduced dietary protein. Of the essential amino acids (EAAs) tested, only intracerebroventricular injection of leucine (10 g) was sufficient to suppress food intake. Isocaloric low-(9% protein energy; LP) or normal-(18% protein energy) protein diets induced a divergence in food intake, with an increased consumption of LP beginning on day 2 and persisting throughout the study (P Ͻ 0.05). Circulating BCAA levels were reduced the day after LP diet exposure, but levels subsequently increased and normalized by day 4, despite persistent hyperphagia. Brain BCAA levels as measured by microdialysis on day 2 of diet exposure were reduced in LP rats, but this effect was most prominent postprandially. Despite these diet-induced changes in BCAA levels, reducing dietary leucine or total BCAAs independently from total protein was neither necessary nor sufficient to induce hyperphagia, while chronic infusion of EAAs into the brain of LP rats failed to consistently block LP-induced hyperphagia. Collectively, these data suggest that circulating BCAAs are transiently reduced by dietary protein restriction, but variations in dietary or brain BCAAs alone do not explain the hyperphagia induced by a low-protein diet.branched-chain amino acids; protein restriction; hypothalamus; macronutrient; food intake ALTHOUGH THE STUDY OF ingestive behavior historically has focused largely on the regulation of energy homeostasis, the consumption of adequate amounts of protein, specifically essential amino acids (EAAs), is also central to health and survival. Therefore, it seems likely that physiological systems exist to ensure sufficient protein intake. Alterations in dietary protein content can have profound effects on food intake, with diets high in protein suppressing food intake and diets moderately low in protein increasing food intake (2,11,18,23,38,39). Furthermore, when given the choice between diets that differ in protein content, many species will self-select between diets to ensure adequate consumption of protein (16,24,27), often at the expense of carbohydrate and fat (9,19,31).Despite these behavioral observations, the mechanism regulating protein intake is largely unknown (21). Recent work has focused on the branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) leucine as a potential protein signal. Intracerebroventricular injections of leucine suppress food intake and regulate key signaling systems (mTOR/AMPK) within hypothalamic neurons, while increased dietary leucine content reproduces the anorectic effects of a high-protein diet (3,5,23,29). While these data demonstrate that administration of excess leucine either to the diet or the brain is sufficient to suppress food intake, it remains unclear whether physiological fluctua...