2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2022.102553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homeostatic plasticity and excitation-inhibition balance: The good, the bad, and the ugly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exact behavioral impact of altered E/I balance in ASD remains largely unclear. A common view states that network hyperexcitability associated with reduced inhibition and altered inhibitory plasticity impairs neural processing (for recent reviews see Antoine, 2022; Chen et al, 2022; Ferguson and Gao, 2018; Liu et al, 2022), an idea well suited to account for perceptual learning deficits resulting from impairments in sensory discrimination (Goel et al, 2018). Alternatively, it has been proposed that altered excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission may not be a primary effect of the ASD phenotype, but rather reflect homeostatic compensations that mitigate other types of dysfunction (Antoine et al, 2019; Domanski et al, 2019; Nelson and Valakh, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact behavioral impact of altered E/I balance in ASD remains largely unclear. A common view states that network hyperexcitability associated with reduced inhibition and altered inhibitory plasticity impairs neural processing (for recent reviews see Antoine, 2022; Chen et al, 2022; Ferguson and Gao, 2018; Liu et al, 2022), an idea well suited to account for perceptual learning deficits resulting from impairments in sensory discrimination (Goel et al, 2018). Alternatively, it has been proposed that altered excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission may not be a primary effect of the ASD phenotype, but rather reflect homeostatic compensations that mitigate other types of dysfunction (Antoine et al, 2019; Domanski et al, 2019; Nelson and Valakh, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have provided evidence that multiple pain models involve alterations in the balance of excitatory/inhibitory (E/I) neurotransmission in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and somatosensory regions [13,14]. Synaptic E/I balance is vital for network stability and information processing [15]; however, the relative role of inhibitory transmission in the ACC in pain states remains largely unexplored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical and experimental studies have confirmed the existence of a dynamically regulated balance of excitation and inhibition in local cortical networks at multiple states of wakefulness and sleep [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. It has been hypothesized that balance of excitation and inhibition is essential for controlling network-level information transmission [19,20], efficient, high-precision, and high-dimensional representations and processing of sensory information [5,11,13], enabling cortical computations by enhancing the range of network sensitivity to sensory inputs [8], selective amplification of specific activity patterns in unstructured inputs [21], maintaining information in working memory [22], and, importantly, preserving network stability [10,23]. Pathological conditions resulting in deviations from normal levels of excitationinhibition balance, hence hypo-or hyper-excitation in cortical networks, have been associated with several neurological disorders, such as Autism Spectrum Disorders, schizophrenia, mood disorders, Alzheimer's disease, Rett Syndrome, and epilepsy [7,9,19,[23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the importance of excitation-inhibition balance in cortical functionality, and numerous homeostatic mechanisms that have been proposed as possible regulatory processes involved in maintaining this balance [8,10,19,23,[28][29][30][31][32][33], little is known about how balance of excitation and inhibition is established in cortical networks, what cellular and network properties are homeostatically adjusted to maintain it, and how it can be accurately and meaningfully measured [16,28,34]. However, it can be conceived that the balance is most likely established and regulated locally, that means through internal recurrent interactions within a local cortical network, since global interactions between different regions of the cortex is predominantly excitatory and cannot be effectively balanced at a global scale by short-range activity of inhibitory neurons [2,7,11,18,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%