“…Auditory METs (aMETs) respond to nanometer displacements of their receiver structures (such as stereociliary hair bundles in vertebrate hair cells or antennal sound receivers in Dipteran insects (Albert and Kozlov, 2016)); but, despite the documented presence of proteostasis network (PN) components (Bokolia and Mishra, 2015) required for MET localization (Lee et al, 2008;Park et al, 2013Park et al, , 2015 and the knowledge that larger (Dice et al, 1979) or mechanically loaded (Kjaer et al, 2006) proteins tend to have higher turnover rates, the protein dynamics (and proteostasis) of aMETs is almost entirely unknown. The study of auditory transducer proteostasis is of scientific importance for two reasons: aMETs are (1) the most sensitive type of mechanotransducers, which are, even in the absence of audible sound, constantly flickering between open and closed states, merely responding to the gating forces provided by thermal noise ; (2) they are part of a sensory system that shows substantial age-and noise-dependent vulnerability in both humans (Liberman, 2017;Gates and Mills, 2005) and Drosophila (Christie et al, 2013;Keder et al, 2020). In fact, proteostasis has been recognized as a major factor in aging processes (Taylor and Dillin, 2011;Toyama and Hetzer, 2013).…”