Homeostatic dysregulation proceeds in parallel in multiple physiological systems

Abstract

SummaryAn increasing number of aging researchers believes that multi‐system physiological dysregulation may be a key biological mechanism of aging, but evidence of this has been sparse. Here, we used biomarker data on nearly 33 000 individuals from four large datasets to test for the presence of multi‐system dysregulation. We grouped 37 biomarkers into six a priori groupings representing physiological systems (lipids, immune, oxygen transport, liver function, vitamins, and electrolytes), then calculated dysregulation scores for each system in each individual using statistical distance. Correlations among dysregulation levels across systems were generally weak but significant. Comparison of these results to dysregulation in arbitrary ‘systems’ generated by random grouping of biomarkers showed that a priori knowledge effectively distinguished the true systems in which dysregulation proceeds most independently. In other words, correlations among dysregulation levels were higher using arbitrary systems, indicating that only a priori systems identified distinct dysregulation processes. Additionally, dysregulation of most systems increased with age and significantly predicted multiple health outcomes including mortality, frailty, diabetes, heart disease, and number of chronic diseases. The six systems differed in how well their dysregulation scores predicted health outcomes and age. These findings present the first unequivocal demonstration of integrated multi‐system physiological dysregulation during aging, demonstrating that physiological dysregulation proceeds neither as a single global process nor as a completely independent process in different systems, but rather as a set of system‐specific processes likely linked through weak feedback effects. These processes – probably many more than the six measured here – are implicated in aging.

Advanced analytical methodologies for measuring healthy ageing and its determinants, using factor analysis and machine learning techniques: the ATHLOS project

“…These alternatives include: (a) algorithms developed to predict chronological age in a reference sample, which are then used to calculate biological age3032; and (b) data reduction techniques based on statistical distance of individuals from some normative reference population. Li et al 33,. employing a procedure developed by Cohen et al 34.…”

Physiological predictors of reproductive performance in the European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris): II. Multivariate Analysis

“…In contrast, red knots were captive during that study and were measured ∼12 times each, reducing variation. Likewise, the human cohorts (mostly elderly) that we have used [25, 28, 29, 31, 32] live in stable environments in developed countries and are not undergoing seasonal breeding cycles. The principle of DM relative to homeostatic control requires a relatively homogeneous population, and this was likely not the case here.…”

Classification for Longevity Potential: The Use of Novel Biomarkers

“…For example, from the nine hallmarks of aging (34), we potentially covered three hallmarks: altered intracellular communication (IgG glycosilation), deregulation of nutrient sensing (glucose and lipid metabolism) and mitochondrial dysfunction (thyroid metabolism). Because physiological dysregulation likely occur at multiple biological processes (35, 36), future identified biomarkers of the other six hallmarks, such as stem cell exhaustion, genomic instability, and epigenetic alterations, have high potential to improve the prediction performance.…”