1994
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bi.63.070194.002415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homeodomain Proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
681
1
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 880 publications
(716 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
14
681
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be due to differences in binding and transcription activity in an in vivo three-dimensional DNA structure and the in vitro binding between DNA and protein in an EMSA and/or to the requirement, for full binding activity, of protein domains outside the homeodomain. Regardless of the explanation for this discrepancy, the results are not without precedent, since domains with relatively weaker binding activities have been reported to be important in the in vivo action of homeodomain-containing proteins (50). Our results also show that in addition to the site at Ϫ125, binding domains at Ϫ446 and Ϫ14 are important but not critical for the transactivation of AoGen by TTF-1.…”
Section: Ttf-1 Regulates Ang Transcription In Subfornical Organcontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…This could be due to differences in binding and transcription activity in an in vivo three-dimensional DNA structure and the in vitro binding between DNA and protein in an EMSA and/or to the requirement, for full binding activity, of protein domains outside the homeodomain. Regardless of the explanation for this discrepancy, the results are not without precedent, since domains with relatively weaker binding activities have been reported to be important in the in vivo action of homeodomain-containing proteins (50). Our results also show that in addition to the site at Ϫ125, binding domains at Ϫ446 and Ϫ14 are important but not critical for the transactivation of AoGen by TTF-1.…”
Section: Ttf-1 Regulates Ang Transcription In Subfornical Organcontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…The Pbx-NFPP complex was further distinct in its recognition of a variant motif in which the third A in the NFPP binding core, which is essential for Pbx-Hox binding to TGATTGAT and which binds the invariant Asn 51 in the Hox HD, could be altered to G without appreciable loss of complex formation. The fact that a hydrogen bond between Asp51 of Hox HDs and this adenine is essential for binding of Hox proteins to their DNA targets suggests that NFPP may not be a HD protein (Desplan et al, 1988;Kissinger et al, 1990;Laughon, 1991;Gehring et al, 1994). NFPP was also distinct from Class I Hox proteins in its failure to form heterodimers with endogenous E2a-Pbx1, even though E2a-Pbx1 was active as demonstrated by its ability to heterodimerize with exogenous HoxA5 on a PRS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, Hox genes belonging to the Abd-B subfamily of the HoxA and HoxD cluster are expressed in the limb mesenchyme in a position-specific fashion (3)(4)(5) and are known to provide the positional cue for limb cartilage pattern formation (6 -8). The Hox genes encode homeodomain proteins that function as transcriptional regulators of downstream target genes through DNA binding by the homeodomain (9). Genes controlling the cell cycle and cell adhesion have been reported to be Hox targets (10 -12); however, the target genes of Abd-B homeoproteins during limb cartilage formation have not yet been identified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%