2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home visitation programs: Critical Issues and Future Directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
91
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(144 reference statements)
1
91
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Only a small number of effectiveness trials of homevisiting services have been conducted. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Additionally, there is little information about the extent to which home-visiting services actually reach disadvantaged mothers.…”
Section: Key Messagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Only a small number of effectiveness trials of homevisiting services have been conducted. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Additionally, there is little information about the extent to which home-visiting services actually reach disadvantaged mothers.…”
Section: Key Messagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Although the specific ARTICLE SUMMARY Article focus ▪ Efficacy trials have reported positive outcomes from home-visiting programmes delivered by nurses to socially disadvantaged mothers and young children. ▪ There is limited information about the effects of home-visiting programmes when delivered as part of routine clinical practice by nurses in community health services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] Some home visitation experts caution that potential program impacts on maltreatment may be obscured by "surveillance effects" because families receiving home visitation (ie, the intervention group) have regular contact with professionals or paraprofessionals who might identify and report instances of maltreatment, whereas families not participating in the program (ie, the control group) are not exposed to the same level of scrutiny. 24,36 The mixed nature of findings for these home visitation programs suggests that the next step is to determine which program strategieswork best for whom and under what conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a review of home visiting evaluation findings suggests measured, nuanced, and contextspecific interpretations that should guide program developers, frontline staff, and researchers in articulating and measuring what is achievable and meaningful, program to program, for the populations and communities served. 15 In this study, we assessed impact results from a randomized, controlled trial of Healthy Families Massachusetts (HFM), the only universal statewide home visiting program that specifically targets and wholly serves first-time young parents; reflecting the Five-Tiered Approach to evaluation, 16,17 we detailed program processes, model fidelity, participants' use of the program, and profiles of relationships between home visitors and clients. Here we describe the main program effects 12 and 24 months after enrollment on 28 indicators grouped into 5 outcome domains: parenting, child development, education, family planning, and maternal health and well-being.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%