Home‐use oral hygiene products: mouthrinses

Moran, John M.

doi:10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00260.x

Cited by 60 publications

(68 citation statements)

References 91 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Fortunately, by brushing properly, thoroughly and regularly the appearance of caries and marginal periodontal disease can be prevented [11]. By applying these simple preventative measures teeth can be kept for a long period of time, not to mention that in addition to protecting teeth some auxiliary methods, as the use of a mouthwash play an important role in reducing halitosis and the occurrence of oral cancer [12,13].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparison of Oral Health Status in Active-, Occasional- and Non- Smoker Patients Versus Students

Benedek¹,

Kovacs²,

Pop³

et al. 2013

Acta Medica Marisiensis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The aim of this case-control study was to assess the smoker and non-smoker patients' oral health status versus students. Methods: The study was based on a clinical examination of 210 young adults (118 women, 92 men) aged between 22-32 years. 105 of these were students in the 5 th and 6 th grade of the Faculty of Dentistry in Tîrgu Mureș and the control group was represented by patients. Patients and students were classifi ed into three groups: non-smokers, occasional-and active smokers. The clinical examination evaluated the dental caries, fi llings, extractions, crowns, root remnants and dental plaque. DMF-S index scores were calculated, and with its help the index of treatment need, dental care index and intensity of caries were determined. Results: The dental treatment need index, DMF-S index and intensity of caries showed increased values in patients. Root remnants (p <0.0001), decay (p = 0.0473) and dental plaque (p = 0.0363) were much higher in the group of active smoker students as in the non-smoker students. Among active smoker patients the incidence of dental calculus (p = 0.0005), of root remnants (p = 0.0022) and of fi llings (p = 0.0441) showed a higher value than in the non-smokers. Conclusions: This study showed that compared with non-student patients, in dental students, a better oral hygiene was coupled with healthier teeth and periodontal. Poor oral hygiene together with smoking seems to worsen the oral health status.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparison of Oral Health Status in Active-, Occasional- and Non- Smoker Patients Versus Students

Benedek¹,

Kovacs²,

Pop³

et al. 2013

Acta Medica Marisiensis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The cationic antiseptic CHX has often been used as a positive control during the assessment of other agents potential on plaque accumulation and gingival bleeding (14). However the side effects limit its duration of use, so recently, alternative non-CHX formulations such as EO and CPC have become a current issue promising better tolerance and similar efficacy (5,15).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparative Study of Fluoride Containing Chlorhexidine and Non-Chlorhexidine Mouthrinses in a Teenage Group

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: The study was planned to assess the effect of a mouthrinse containing Chlorhexidine (CHX) and amine/stannous fluoride (AmF) on plaque accumulation, gingivitis and salivary fluoride levels in comparison with two mouthrinses containing either essential oils (EO) or cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) with sodium fluoride (NaF) in a teenage group. Methodology: For this study 82 healthy teenage between 13 and 16 years were recruited for participation. The experimental gingivitis model consisted of a 2-weeks recruitment phase, followed by a 6-day rinsing period with one of the 4 mouthrinse formulations was used for the study. At the end of the pre-phase period and the rinsing period (Day-0/Day-6), gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI) and salivary fluoride levels were recorded. The statistical analyses were performed using Wilcoxon sign test and the dependent t test.

show abstract

“…Toothbrush is the most used plaque control device. As adjuncts to toothbrushing, dentifrices and rinsing solutions have been proposed, in order to enhance the plaque removal efficacy (6)(7)(8).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Supragingival plaque removal with and without dentifrice: a randomized controlled clinical trial

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of dental plaque removal by brushing with and without conventional dentifrice. Twenty-four students aged 17 to 28 years participated in this randomized controlled clinical trial. Quadrants 1-3 or 2-4 were randomly allocated to the test group (brushing without dentifrice) or control group (brushing with dentifrice). After 72 h of cessation of oral hygiene, Quigley & Hein (Turesky) plaque index was assessed before and after brushing by a calibrated and blind examiner. Overtime and intergroup comparisons were performed by Student's paired sample t-test at 5% significance level. The results showed that both groups after toothbrushing presented statistically significant reductions in plaque, with no differences between them (from 3.06 ± 0.54 to 1.27 ± 0.26 versus from 3.07 ± 0.52 to 1.31 ± 0.23). A separate analysis of the buccal and lingual aspects also showed no significant differences between groups. It may be concluded that the use of a conventional dentifrice during toothbrushing does not seem to enhance plaque removal capacity.

show abstract

Home‐use oral hygiene products: mouthrinses

Cited by 60 publications

References 91 publications

A Comparison of Oral Health Status in Active-, Occasional- and Non- Smoker Patients Versus Students

A Comparison of Oral Health Status in Active-, Occasional- and Non- Smoker Patients Versus Students

A Comparative Study of Fluoride Containing Chlorhexidine and Non-Chlorhexidine Mouthrinses in a Teenage Group

Supragingival plaque removal with and without dentifrice: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About