1991
DOI: 10.1016/0168-8510(91)90008-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home service costs: The Swedish experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One Swedish study showed that cognitively impaired persons received less home help than persons of good mental health (Svensson, Edebalk, & Persson, 1991), whereas another Swedish study found no association between dementia and receipt of home help (Lagergren, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One Swedish study showed that cognitively impaired persons received less home help than persons of good mental health (Svensson, Edebalk, & Persson, 1991), whereas another Swedish study found no association between dementia and receipt of home help (Lagergren, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shifting the focus from community samples to samples of home help recipients, a British study found that home care provision to persons with dementia could be explained in terms of activity limitations, whereas there was no association between depression and the number of hours of home care per week (Banerjee & MacDonald, 1996). One Swedish study showed that cognitively impaired persons received less home help than persons of good mental health (Svensson, Edebalk, & Persson, 1991), whereas another Swedish study found no association between dementia and receipt of home help (Lagergren, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean annual costs per recipient varied from SEK 1,985 to SEK 8,215. Another study that examined staff costs for 180 recipients' use of the alarm system in three municipalities in southern Sweden estimated the mean annual costs per recipient at SEK 20,000 (15). The discrepancy between these two results is due primarily to the more detailed costing approach used in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%