Blood Pressure Monitoring in Cardiovascular Medicine and Therapeutics 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-22771-9_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home (Self) Monitoring of Blood Pressure in Clinical Trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the last two decades, HBPM has been used increasingly in clinical hypertension research [17,155,[267][268][269][270][271][272][273]. Its multiple advantages lead to superior diagnostic reliability and measurement reproducibility, ensuring improved accuracy of clinical trials as compared with the use of OBP measurements, and thereby leading to smaller study sample size and lower research costs, together with better patients' acceptance, particularly for longer term trials [17].…”
Section: Hbpm In Clinical Research (Box 30)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last two decades, HBPM has been used increasingly in clinical hypertension research [17,155,[267][268][269][270][271][272][273]. Its multiple advantages lead to superior diagnostic reliability and measurement reproducibility, ensuring improved accuracy of clinical trials as compared with the use of OBP measurements, and thereby leading to smaller study sample size and lower research costs, together with better patients' acceptance, particularly for longer term trials [17].…”
Section: Hbpm In Clinical Research (Box 30)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, while techniques like 24-hr ambulatory blood pressure monitoring have been shown to increase reproducibility [ 13 15 ] and yield lower estimations of placebo response [ 16 – 19 ], their adoption as primary efficacy endpoints in FDA clinical trials for hypertension has not been widespread. Only two out of 63 trials (3.2%) used such a technique as a primary outcome measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changing the context and increasing data points by using more frequent out-of-office measurements, such as 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure cuffs or in-home self-monitoring, may reduce the statistical noise of normal blood pressure variability. Such techniques may therefore increase reproducibility [ 13 15 ] and yield lower estimations of placebo response [ 16 – 19 ]. The adoption of such techniques in the measurement of primary efficacy endpoints in FDA clinical trials has not been quantified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%