The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16x684289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home remedy or hazard? management and costs of paediatric steam inhalation therapy burn injuries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(21 reference statements)
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the aforementioned paper by Al Himdani et al [11] most scalds were sustained by tipping hot water from bowls, a mechanism also backed up by other papers [4] , [10] . It is obvious most GPs would not recommend steam inhalation by placing vessels of boiling water directly on laps or on unstable surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the aforementioned paper by Al Himdani et al [11] most scalds were sustained by tipping hot water from bowls, a mechanism also backed up by other papers [4] , [10] . It is obvious most GPs would not recommend steam inhalation by placing vessels of boiling water directly on laps or on unstable surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It also advised “sitting in the bathroom with a running hot shower is a safe option.” However, the worry is whether the government's advice is being passed on to patients. A previous study [11] in 2016 looked at steam inhalation scalds in the paediatric population. In it's survey of GPs in Wales, it found that 81% ( n = 17) had advised patients to use steam inhalation in their career.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…9 The study also includes a small pragmatic survey suggesting that over 80% of the UK GP respondents surveyed recommend steam inhalation therapy. This raises important questions about why therapies with no evidence of effectiveness, but evidence of harm, continue to be accepted and even endorsed as part of GP advice.…”
Section: A Dangerous Historymentioning
confidence: 99%