2009
DOI: 10.3354/meps07930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home range size and patterns of space use by lingcod, copper rockfish and quillback rockfish in relation to diel and tidal cycles

Abstract: The estimation of home range size of marine fish has received attention because of its application to the design of marine reserves. How individuals use space may also be important to the management of the species and for understanding behavioral processes like optimal foraging or territoriality. We used an acoustic tracking system (VRAP) to examine patterns in home range size and movement behavior for 3 demersal fishes in Puget Sound: lingcod Ophiodon elongatus, copper rockfish Sebastes caurinus and quillback… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(24 reference statements)
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…diurnal, tidal or seasonal) that is not accounted for in survey designs, abundance and biomass estimates may be biased. Temperate reef-associated fishes typically have ranges with small 'core areas' (tens of metres in diameter; [44]) but may undertake brief longer range excursions (hundreds of metres to kilometres) to forage [22,44]. The 'snapshot' temporal scale of our surveys means that such foraging excursions are unlikely to be captured and hence observed communities may be 'subsidized' by prey production that occurs at a broader spatial scale than is represented by the distribution of fishes on transects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…diurnal, tidal or seasonal) that is not accounted for in survey designs, abundance and biomass estimates may be biased. Temperate reef-associated fishes typically have ranges with small 'core areas' (tens of metres in diameter; [44]) but may undertake brief longer range excursions (hundreds of metres to kilometres) to forage [22,44]. The 'snapshot' temporal scale of our surveys means that such foraging excursions are unlikely to be captured and hence observed communities may be 'subsidized' by prey production that occurs at a broader spatial scale than is represented by the distribution of fishes on transects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the 95% KUD was only calculated for the diurnal and nocturnal time periods to make specific diel movement comparisons (e.g. Tolimieri et al 2009). Diurnal and nocturnal periods were defined based on the United States Naval Observatory sunrise/sunset time charts (http://aa.…”
Section: Tagging and Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most research on the home range of fishes has focused on freshwater taxa (Lyons & Lucas 2002), reefassociated fishes (Holland et al 1996, Zeller 1997, Eristhee & Oxenford 2001, seagrass or kelp bedassociated fishes (Topping et al 2005, Jadot et al 2006, and demersal fishes (Lembo et al 2002, Jorgensen et al 2006, Schroepfer & Szedlmayer 2006, Tolimieri et al 2009). Measurement of home ranges for pelagic fishes does not appear to have been examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%