2003
DOI: 10.1674/0003-0031(2003)150[0352:hsahub]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home-range Size and Habitat Used by the Northern Myotis (Myotis septentrionalis)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
39
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Silver-haired bats were active in unharvested patches on only one occasion in Alberta, showed intermediate levels of activity in 20% and 50% retention patches, and had their highest activity level in clearcuts (Patriquin and Barclay 2003). In West Virginia, silver-haired bats were more active in both clearcuts and deferment cuts (6-10 m 2 /ha residual basal area) than in intact stands and stands cut to a 40-cm diameter limit; this pattern was opposite to that shown by little brown and northern longeared bats (Owen et al 2003(Owen et al , 2004.…”
Section: Mammals Batsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Silver-haired bats were active in unharvested patches on only one occasion in Alberta, showed intermediate levels of activity in 20% and 50% retention patches, and had their highest activity level in clearcuts (Patriquin and Barclay 2003). In West Virginia, silver-haired bats were more active in both clearcuts and deferment cuts (6-10 m 2 /ha residual basal area) than in intact stands and stands cut to a 40-cm diameter limit; this pattern was opposite to that shown by little brown and northern longeared bats (Owen et al 2003(Owen et al , 2004.…”
Section: Mammals Batsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Northern long-eared bats glean insects from foliage but rarely forage over water (Owen et al, 2003), and therefore have no requirement to roost close to water bodies other than possibly to drink. While little brown bats regularly forage often over water (Anthony and Kunz, 1977), they also frequently forage within the forests (Krusic et al, 1996;Jung et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we calculated the percentage of each land cover type in a 2-km buffer surrounding each park (Ghert and Chelsvig 2003). All extant bat species in the region are known to forage up to 2 km or more from their roost sites (Menzel et al 2001;Owen et al 2003;Elmore et al 2005;Broders et al 2006). We consolidated the original 19 land cover types in the NLCD into six land cover types: water, developed (low and high intensity residential, commercial, industrial, and transportation), barren (emergent rock, sand, quarries, and mines), forested, open (pastures, row crops, and urban grasses), and wetlands (woody and emergent herbaceous wetlands).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eastern pipistrelles (Pipistrellus subflavus) should be detected similarly between forested and fragmented parks, and more frequently at rural parks, which were closer to hibernacula (Menzel et al 2002a, Ghert and Chelsvig 2004. We expected that northern myotis (Myotis septentrionalis) and eastern small-footed myotis (Myotis leibii), a Maryland state-endangered species, would be encountered more frequently in rural, forested parks (Caceres and Barclay 2000;Owen et al 2003;Patriquin and Barclay 2003;Ghert and Chelsvig 2004;Ford et al 2005;Wund 2006). Although Indiana myotis, a federally-listed endangered species, also most likely would be detected in forested parks (Clawson 2002;Ford et al 2005), they could occur throughout the landscape regardless of distance to hibernacula because of their ability to migrate >500 km (Kurta and Murray 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%