Within populations, individual animals may vary considerably in morphology and ecology. The degree to which variation in morphology is related to ecological variation within a population remains largely unexplored. We investigated whether variation in body size and shape among sexes and age classes of the lizard Podarcis melisellensis translates in differential whole-animal performance (sprint speed, bite force), escape and prey attack behaviour in the field, microhabitat use and diet. Male and female adult lizards differed significantly in body size and head and limb proportions. These morphological differences were reflected in differences in bite strength, but not in sprint speed. Accordingly, field measurements of escape behaviour and prey attack speed did not differ between the sexes, but males ate larger, harder and faster prey than females. In addition to differences in body size, juveniles diverged from adults in relative limb and head dimensions. These shape differences may explain the relatively high sprint and bite capacities of juvenile lizards. Ontogenetic variation in morphology and performance is strongly reflected in the behaviour and ecology in the field, with juveniles differing from adults in aspects of their microhabitat use, escape behaviour and diet. . It is tempting to ascribe these ecological differences directly to sexual or ontogenetic differences in body size or shape, but theoretical developments in ecological morphology and empirical observations suggest that the relationship deserves closer inspection.In the spirit of Arnold's (1983) seminal contribution to ecological morphology, prudent assessments of the relationship between the morphology and the ecology of males and females, or juveniles and adults, requires measurements of whole-animal performance. These measurements will indicate whether the morphological variation observed is functionally and ecologically relevant, i.e. translates into differential performance. For instance, does sexual dimorphism in head size actually contribute to differences in bite performance? This is not self-evident, especially not when structures relevant in a survival context (e.g. aiding feeding or locomotion) are at the same time under sexual selection. Sexual selection for larger heads could, for example, theoretically increase head size in males without affecting muscle mass (Herrel Aguirre LF, Herrel A, Van Damme R, Mathyssen E. 2003. The implications of food hardness for diet in bats. Functional Ecology 17: 201-212. Arnold SJ. 1983. Morphology, performance and fitness. American Zoologist 23: 347-361. Bauwens D, Thoen C. 1981. Escape tactics and vulnerability to predation associated with reproduction in the lizard Lacerta vivipara. Journal of Animal Ecology 50: 733-743. Bonine KE, Garland T Jr. 1999. Sprint performance of phrynosomatid lizards, measured on a high-speed treadmill, correlates with hindlimb length. Journal of Zoology, London 248: 255-265. Bonnet X, Ineich I, Shine R. 2005. Terrestrial locomotion in sea snakes: the effects of sex and...