2010
DOI: 10.1674/0003-0031-164.1.80
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home Range and Survival of the Ozark Pocket Gopher (Geomys bursarius ozarkensis) in Arkansas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The survival rate we observed is similar to the only comparable study to examine survival in pocket gophers (Connior and Risch 2010). It is likely that, like most geomyids, the southeastern pocket gopher has high survival because its fossorial lifestyle reduces predation risk.…”
Section: Survival and Cause-specific Mortalitysupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The survival rate we observed is similar to the only comparable study to examine survival in pocket gophers (Connior and Risch 2010). It is likely that, like most geomyids, the southeastern pocket gopher has high survival because its fossorial lifestyle reduces predation risk.…”
Section: Survival and Cause-specific Mortalitysupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Cameron et al (1988) concluded that the area covered by the burrow systems of Attwater's pocket gopher Geomys attwateri was highly variable between individuals, and uncorrelated differences with sex, age, or body size. Conversely, home range size of the Ozark pocket gopher Geomys bursarius ozarkensis was directly proportional to body size in juvenile females, inversely proportional to body size in adult females, and uncorrelated with body size in males (Connior and Risch 2010). Although presence of southeastern pocket gophers is influenced by soil (Warren et al, in press) and vegetation (Ross 1976) characteristics, how those habitat features influence home range size is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Body mass (g) for female (n 5 3) and male (n 5 5) G. b. majusculus from Kansas averaged (ranges in parentheses) 221.2 (199.3-246.9) and 407.5 (351.0-473.0), respectively (Hendricksen 1972). Body mass (g) for female (n 5 69) and male (n 5 48) G. b. ozarkensis from Arkansas averaged (ranges in parentheses) 158 and 209 (138-294), respectively (Connior 2008).…”
Section: General Charactersmentioning
confidence: 99%