1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3932(97)00026-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home production with endogenous growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the markup increases with i, housing prices de ‡ated by consumer prices may go down, but housing prices de ‡ated by producer prices must go up with in ‡ation. 24 We can also de ‡ate housing prices by the money supply, as we did in the data presentation 24 One can also look at nominal prices, and derive…”
Section: In Steady State (41) Impliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the markup increases with i, housing prices de ‡ated by consumer prices may go down, but housing prices de ‡ated by producer prices must go up with in ‡ation. 24 We can also de ‡ate housing prices by the money supply, as we did in the data presentation 24 One can also look at nominal prices, and derive…”
Section: In Steady State (41) Impliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 As an alternative, Fisher (1997) explains residential and non-residential investment comovement by assuming complementarity between the household and business capital in goods production. In an endogenous growth framework, Einarsson and Marquis (1997) show that a positive productivity shock in production leads to time re-allocation, from human capital accumulation to market goods and home production. Consequently, business and residential investment both increase, thereby creating an observed comovement.…”
Section: Quantity Comovementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While numerous endogenous growth models that rely upon human capital accumulation have focused upon the role of formal education (e.g., Lucas, 1988;Barro, 2001), there has been little or no attention to informal variants of education. This is true even of growth models with home production (e.g., Rosenzweig and Wolpin, 1993;Einarsson and Marquis, 1997). 2 We find the absence of theoretical work relating consumption and leisure activities to human capital accumulation and growth to be surprising, for several reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%