1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0261-5614(96)80019-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home parenteral nutrition in adults: a multicentre surveyin Europe in 1993

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
39
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, there are very few data to be compared with those which were observed in this study. In the European countries, the point prevalence of HPN has been reported to range between 5 and 49 cases per million inhabitants [3], with a percentage of patients having a malignant disease ranging from 5 to 60% [4]. Therefore, the prevalence of HPN for CIF due to benign disease has been estimated to range from 5 to 20 Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, there are very few data to be compared with those which were observed in this study. In the European countries, the point prevalence of HPN has been reported to range between 5 and 49 cases per million inhabitants [3], with a percentage of patients having a malignant disease ranging from 5 to 60% [4]. Therefore, the prevalence of HPN for CIF due to benign disease has been estimated to range from 5 to 20 Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, the use of HEN in oncological patients was approximately twice that of the UK. The Italian attitude towards the use of HPN in the context of palliative care for cancer patients has been well recognised since the first European survey on HPN in 1993 [4]. Another reason could be the more frequent use of a central venous catheter previously positioned for chemotherapy for HPN instead of activating enteral tube feeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in our patients treated for o4 weeks, HPN was provided only as compassionate therapy and mostly for hydrating, more than full PN therapy. HPN registries available from various countries as well as international reports display a quite large difference in terms of patient selection (Mughal and Irving, 1986;Howard et al, 1991Howard et al, , 1995De Francesco et al, 1995;Takagi et al, 1995;Bozzetti et al, 1996;Van Gossum et al, 1996, 1999Faisinger and Gramlich, 1997; Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients, 2002; SINPE Executive Committee, 2002b). In particular, cancer cases may represent the largest percentage of HPN patients in some (for example 57% in Italy or 60% in The Netherlands) and the lowest in other countries, that is, 8% in Denmark and 5% in the United Kingdom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear from the available literature on national registries that HPN in some countries is currently prescribed in terminal cancer patients while this is not the rule in others (Mughal and Irving, 1986;Howard et al, 1991Howard et al, , 1995Van Gossum et al, 1996, 1999. Furthermore, the appropriateness of indications remains a clinical challenge to improve its application, besides other already referred factors, such as local economic, social and cultural influences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the introduction of HPN in the 1970s, HPN prevalence and incidence have been steadily increasing in Europe, with a large multicentric survey showing an annual incidence of 4-6 per 10 6 inhabitants and a prevalence of 2-40 per 10 6 inhabitants [4][5][6] . The most common indications for long-term HPN in Europe are Crohn's disease, mesenteric vascular disease, cancer and radiation enteritis [7] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%