2007
DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home bias and purchasing power parity: evidence from the G‐7 countries

Abstract: Recent studies in the international economics literature emphasize the role of home bias in explaining a number of empirical puzzles. In the present study, we test for the following hypotheses: (i) that a home bias effect, which is nevertheless falling over time as traded goods markets become more integrated and consumption preferences become more similar across developed countries, influences the relationship among nominal exchange rates, domestic and foreign prices, and (ii) that incorporation of the home bi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This feature is studied by Coval and Moskowitz (1999) who show that American investors exhibit a strong preference for locally headquartered, small and highly levered firms. It is also documented by extant empirical literature in international market (Mylonidis andSideris, 2008 andXing andLi, 2011). …”
Section: Results Of the Multifactor Regression Approachmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This feature is studied by Coval and Moskowitz (1999) who show that American investors exhibit a strong preference for locally headquartered, small and highly levered firms. It is also documented by extant empirical literature in international market (Mylonidis andSideris, 2008 andXing andLi, 2011). …”
Section: Results Of the Multifactor Regression Approachmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Amadi (2004) revealed a significant decline in home bias due to the increasing popularity of the internet and mutual funds. Mylonidis and Sideris (2008) stated that home bias has diminished due to international integration. Although the explicit barriers to international portfolio investment have been significantly reduced or even eliminated, FPI is still too limited and far below the level proposed by MPT.…”
Section: Implicit Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 A number of reasons have been offered in the literature to explain the empirical failure of PPP at its strong version (for a survey, see, inter alia, Taylor, 2006). The reasons include: problems due to productivity differentials -the Balassa-Samuelson effect -(see, inter alia, Lothian and Taylor, 2008) measurement errors, (see, inter alia, Taylor, 1988), aggregation problems (see, inter alia, Taylor, 2001), the effects of interventions in the foreign exchange markets, (see, inter alia, Sideris, 2008), the effects of home bias (Mylonidis and Sideris, 2008).…”
Section: Testing For G-ppp Using Cointegration Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%