2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21185993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home-Based Sleep Sensor Measurements in an Older Australian Population: Before and during a Pandemic

Abstract: Older adults are susceptible to poor night-time sleep, characterized by short sleep duration and high sleep disruptions (i.e., more frequent and longer awakenings). This study aimed to longitudinally and objectively assess the changes in sleep patterns of older Australians during the 2020 pandemic lockdown. A non-invasive mattress-based device, known as the EMFIT QS, was used to continuously monitor sleep in 31 older adults with an average age of 84 years old before (November 2019–February 2020) and during (Ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous longitudinal studies have employed CSTs for at-home monitoring of sleep behavior in older adult populations [ 18 , 32–35 ] ( Supplementary Caption 1 ). While these studies have demonstrated the value and scalability of CSTs for studying sleep behavior under various conditions such as COVID-19, PLWD, and health deteriorations, they did not use a standard sleep technology such as actigraphy combined with sleep diary information for evaluating the validity of the contactless sleep monitoring data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous longitudinal studies have employed CSTs for at-home monitoring of sleep behavior in older adult populations [ 18 , 32–35 ] ( Supplementary Caption 1 ). While these studies have demonstrated the value and scalability of CSTs for studying sleep behavior under various conditions such as COVID-19, PLWD, and health deteriorations, they did not use a standard sleep technology such as actigraphy combined with sleep diary information for evaluating the validity of the contactless sleep monitoring data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many sleep-stage detection pipelines will have been developed based on data obtained in healthy people under controlled laboratory conditions. Some studies have evaluated individual CSTs in older adults, but these studies have been limited to either lab or home settings with assessment limited to simple bed presence or sleep summary assessments of nocturnal sleep only [ 18–24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, we included four different sleep statuses: 1) mean sleep duration (eight studies) ( Alqurashi et al, 2022 ; Ataka, Kimura, Eguchi, & Matsubara, 2022 ; Garcia Carlini et al, 2023 ; Ikeda et al, 2022 ; Kholghi et al, 2021 ; Makizako et al, 2021 ; Mistry et al, 2021 ; Wielgoszewska et al, 2022 ); 2) mean sleep efficiency (three studies) ( Ataka et al, 2022 ; Garcia Carlini et al, 2023 ; Kholghi et al, 2021 ); 3) mean sleep quality scores (four studies) ( Chin et al, 2022 ; Garcia Carlini et al, 2023 ; Hausman et al, 2022 ; Tracy et al, 2022 ); 4) mean ISI scores (three studies) ( Dale et al, 2021 ; Gezgin Yazici & Ökten, 2022 ; Pieh et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies investigated sleep problems and evaluated whether and how sleep quality was affected during the 2020-2021 period in several countries [15][16][17][18][19] . These studies identifying effects either of the pandemic restrictions (e.g., stay-at-home orders) or the isolation or quarantine on sleep schedules/sleep quality in children, adolescents, adults, and patients with comorbidities [20][21][22][23][24] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%