2010
DOI: 10.1177/0734242x10373801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home and community composting for on-site treatment of urban organic waste: perspective for Europe and Canada

Abstract: Management of municipal solid waste (MSW) is a challenge faced by urban centres worldwide, including the European Union (EU) and Canada, as a result of urbanization and economic prosperity accelerating the generation of municipal solid wastes (MSW) along with its organic fraction. Within a concept of waste recovery, source separation and on-site treatment of urban organic waste (UOW) can resolve major economic issues and faced by urban centres along with environmental and social issues associated with landfill… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
36
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to other biowaste treatments, such as industrial composting, incineration, landfilling or wastewater drainage, home composting is regarded as being an equivalent or even a better option with regard to sustainability (Chan et al, 2011;Andersen et al, 2011;Lleó et al, 2013). Even for large cities, Adhikari et al (2010) estimated a potential for decentralised composting systems to accommodate up to 50% of generated municipal organic waste thus reducing costs and greenhouse gas emissions by 34% to 50% and 40%, respectively, as compared to standard landfill disposal. The compost generated from local decentralised composters is in most cases consumed locally in domestic garden production of food and non-food crops (Adhikari et al, 2010;Scheromm, in press) with obvious beneficial carbon footprint implications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to other biowaste treatments, such as industrial composting, incineration, landfilling or wastewater drainage, home composting is regarded as being an equivalent or even a better option with regard to sustainability (Chan et al, 2011;Andersen et al, 2011;Lleó et al, 2013). Even for large cities, Adhikari et al (2010) estimated a potential for decentralised composting systems to accommodate up to 50% of generated municipal organic waste thus reducing costs and greenhouse gas emissions by 34% to 50% and 40%, respectively, as compared to standard landfill disposal. The compost generated from local decentralised composters is in most cases consumed locally in domestic garden production of food and non-food crops (Adhikari et al, 2010;Scheromm, in press) with obvious beneficial carbon footprint implications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As pointed out by Lleó et al (2013), home composting has not been studied extensively from a technical and scientific perspective, while Adhikari et al (2010) indicated the need for more studies into performance and quality of compost products from home and community composters. Current limited literature suggests that the properties of home composts are within the compost quality limits and similar to industrial compost from source separated organic waste (Martínez-Blanco et al, 2010;Andersen et al, 2011;Karnchanawong and Suriyanon, 2011), except for moisture content, which was usually higher.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Amounts of municipal solid waste (MSW) as well as of organic waste are closely correlated to gross domestic product (GDP) and are therefore increasing sharply in many countries [2]. Household waste is collected regularly in most countries at public expense and subsequently incinerated or landfilled [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, decentralised composting is also an innovative way to involve waste generators as key actors in treatment operations. This technology also contributes to reducing waste transportation, treatment costs and landfilling volumes, as it was demonstrated in several life cycle assessments reported in literature [4][5][6][7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%