2002
DOI: 10.1006/aima.2002.2085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holonomy and Parallel Transport for Abelian Gerbes

Abstract: In this paper, we establish a one-to-one correspondence between Uð1Þ-gerbes with connections, on the one hand, and their holonomies, for simply connected manifolds, or their parallel transports, in the general case, on the other hand. This result is a higher-order analogue of the familiar equivalence between bundles with connections and their holonomies for connected manifolds. The holonomy of a gerbe with group Uð1Þ on a simply connected manifold M is a group morphism from the thin second homotopy group to Uð… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
87
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases, our claim shows to be true. Similar results for abelian gerbes have been obtained in [MP02]. Connections on a certain class of (possibly) non-abelian gerbes have been introduced by Breen and Messing [BM05].…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…In both cases, our claim shows to be true. Similar results for abelian gerbes have been obtained in [MP02]. Connections on a certain class of (possibly) non-abelian gerbes have been introduced by Breen and Messing [BM05].…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…This work was deeply inspired by the ideas of Breen and Messing [28,29], who considered a special class of 2-groups, and omitted the equation t(B) = d A + A ∧ A, since their sort of connection did not assign holonomies to surfaces. One should also compare the closely related work of Mackaay, Martins, and Picken [65,67,68], and the work of Pfeiffer and Girelli [76,56].…”
Section: -Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interest in gerbes has been revived recently following a concrete approach due to Hitchin and Chatterjee [15]. Gerbes can be understood both in terms of local geometry, local functions and forms, and in terms of non-local geometry, holonomies and parallel transports, and these two viewpoints are equivalent, in a sense made precise by Mackaay and the author in [16], following on from work by Barrett [5] and Caetano and the author [11]. In [16] holonomies around spheres and parallel transports along cylinders were considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%