2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00208-007-0200-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holomorphic extension of CR functions from quadratic cones

Abstract: It is proved that CR functions on a quadratic cone M in C n , n > 1, admit one-sided holomorphic extension if and only if M does not have two-sided support, a geometric condition on M which generalizes minimality in the sense of Tumanov. A biholomorphic classification of quadratic cones in C 2 is also given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First of all, without an additional topological assumption, non-minimality by itself does not suffice. Further, there is another geometric condition, first introduced in [9], called two-sided support, that also gives rise to non-extendable CR functions. We say that M has proper two-sided support at p ∈ M if there is an open neighbourhood Ω of p such that M divides Ω into two connected components Ω + and Ω − , and there exist germs at p of distinct complex analytic hypersurfaces A ± ⊂ Ω ± such that A + ∩ M = A − ∩ M , see §4.3 for details.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First of all, without an additional topological assumption, non-minimality by itself does not suffice. Further, there is another geometric condition, first introduced in [9], called two-sided support, that also gives rise to non-extendable CR functions. We say that M has proper two-sided support at p ∈ M if there is an open neighbourhood Ω of p such that M divides Ω into two connected components Ω + and Ω − , and there exist germs at p of distinct complex analytic hypersurfaces A ± ⊂ Ω ± such that A + ∩ M = A − ∩ M , see §4.3 for details.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been generalized to graphs of continuous real-valued functions by Chirka [8]. It was shown in [9] that for singular hypersurfaces, minimality is no longer a sufficient condition for local one-sided holomorphic extension (see §4.3). Combining this with Theorem 3 above we conclude that for singular hypersurfaces minimality is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for one-sided holomorphic extension of CR functions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We write (7) simply means that f is CR whenever the current f [M ] 0,1 is ∂-closed in Ω. This leads to the following Definition 3.1.…”
Section: Definitions and Examples Recall That An (Embeddedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note on this version: An earlier version of this article was published as [6], and subsequently an erratum [7] correcting some mistakes was published. This version incorporates the corrections from [7], as well as corrections of a few minor typos, and is posted in ArXiv.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%