1967
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9904-1967-11760-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holomorphic approximation on real submanifolds of a complex manifold

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…that rank(F,,) =0, then an easy and wetlknown result (see [9]) gives H = C(dp(G)) and hence A = C(G) by the previous identifications.…”
Section: Recall That Rep(g) = { F~ C(g)mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…that rank(F,,) =0, then an easy and wetlknown result (see [9]) gives H = C(dp(G)) and hence A = C(G) by the previous identifications.…”
Section: Recall That Rep(g) = { F~ C(g)mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The case when M is of class C ∞ and E is empty is in papers by Nirenberg and Wells [17], [18]. The case when M is an m-dimensional manifold of class C r with r ≥ (m/2) + 1 (and E is arbitrary) is in a paper of Hörmander and Wermer [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the results of this paper were announced in [12]. For real-analytic submanifolds, an independent proof of our principal result (Theorem 6.1) (in its original form) was given in [15], and has been extended to certain classes of realanalytic subvarieties [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…from a totally real submanifold M of a smooth function m on M so that du vanishes to high order on M (the formal Cauchy-Kovalevsky theorem in this situation) and then solving a d-Neumann problem in an appropriate tubular neighborhood was outlined in a letter to the second author in 1965. The original proofs of some of the theorems presented here (as outlined in [12]) were based on this technique along with a detailed analysis of the dependence on the domain of the estimates in [10]. At a later date Hörmander pointed out the applicability of Proposition 5.4 to this problem, enabling us to simplify our analysis considerably, by allowing us to use the L2 estimates of [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%