2022
DOI: 10.3390/s22134915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HoloLens 1 vs. HoloLens 2: Improvements in the New Model for Orthopedic Oncological Interventions

Abstract: This work analyzed the use of Microsoft HoloLens 2 in orthopedic oncological surgeries and compares it to its predecessor (Microsoft HoloLens 1). Specifically, we developed two equivalent applications, one for each device, and evaluated the augmented reality (AR) projection accuracy in an experimental scenario using phantoms based on two patients. We achieved automatic registration between virtual and real worlds using patient-specific surgical guides on each phantom. They contained a small adaptor for a 3D-pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MR device used was HoloLens 2 (Microsoft), an untethered, head-mounted device that permits users to view 3D holographic images as part of their surrounding environment Figure 1…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MR device used was HoloLens 2 (Microsoft), an untethered, head-mounted device that permits users to view 3D holographic images as part of their surrounding environment Figure 1…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in order to further improve the authenticity of virtual surgery, some input devices shaped like scalpel, tweezer, vascular clamp and so on can be well-designed for specific application [44,45]. With the continuous upgrade of hardware, the advanced equipment for augmented reality or mixed reality like Microsoft HoloLens with gesture tracking will further improve the effect of virtual surgery [46][47][48].…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An AR system provides physicians additional information both during and before the procedures. However, AR systems often have relatively limited physician control, oftentimes due to the nature of integrating AR technology with currently used systems [2]. Differences in user interfaces (UI) have been shown to have a greater impact on task completion than headset type [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%