2009
DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/10/079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holography from conformal field theory

Abstract: The locality of bulk physics at distances below the AdS length scale is one of the remarkable aspects of AdS/CFT duality, and one of the least tested. It requires that the AdS radius be large compared to the Planck length and the string length. In the CFT this implies a large-N expansion and a gap in the spectum of anomalous dimensions. We conjecture that the implication also runs in the other direction, so that any CFT with a large-N expansion and a large gap has a local bulk dual. For an abstract CFT we form… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

74
1,473
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 723 publications
(1,551 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(107 reference statements)
74
1,473
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We then use this assumption to perform the Bogoliubov transformation that relates the global and the Rindler reconstructions. This assumption is quite plausible, and essentially follows from the assumed large-N structure of the CFT [39], but it would still be nice if we could explicitly demonstrate the structure of the quantum error correcting code in the CFT. In particular, in section 4.2 we had to use bulk causality to argue that the necessary and sufficient condition (3.28) for operator algebra quantum error correction held, and we were not able to check it explicitly for all possible CFT operators on A.…”
Section: Mera As An Error Correcting Code?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then use this assumption to perform the Bogoliubov transformation that relates the global and the Rindler reconstructions. This assumption is quite plausible, and essentially follows from the assumed large-N structure of the CFT [39], but it would still be nice if we could explicitly demonstrate the structure of the quantum error correcting code in the CFT. In particular, in section 4.2 we had to use bulk causality to argue that the necessary and sufficient condition (3.28) for operator algebra quantum error correction held, and we were not able to check it explicitly for all possible CFT operators on A.…”
Section: Mera As An Error Correcting Code?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2.7) simplifies to 19) and integrated conformal blocks in eq. (2.14), hence contributions as in figure 2a, would not contribute to (2.16).…”
Section: Jhep11(2017)167mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…trace operators with spin greater than two have a parametrically large dimension [19]. More precisely, in the large-N limit the CFT reduces to a subset of operators having small dimension (i.e., a dimension ∆ that does not scale with N ), and whose connected n-point functions are suppressed by powers of 1/N .…”
Section: Jhep11(2017)167mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This restricts the OPE coefficients of the theory to scale, at most, exponentially in c. Second, the theory has a gap, in the sense that the density of states of dimension ∆ O(c) grows polynomially with c, at most. 3 Duals to Einstein gravity with a finite number of light fields have an O(c 0 ) density of states below the gap, but these are a mere corner of the general space of holographic CFTs [25,26].…”
Section: Cft At Large Cmentioning
confidence: 99%