2013
DOI: 10.1007/jhep01(2013)115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holographic interpretations of the renormalization group

Abstract: In semiclassical holographic duality, the running couplings of a field theory are conventionally identified with the classical solutions of field equations in the dual gravitational theory. However, this identification is unclear when the bulk fields fluctuate. Recent work has used a Wilsonian framework to propose an alternative identification of the running couplings in terms of non-fluctuating data; in the classical limit, these new couplings do not satisfy the bulk equations of motion. We study renormalizat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
75
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our interpretation of this relation looks quite transparent and explicit to us, but we should point out that it is closely related to previous proposals in [20] and [17], respectively. The first proposal [20] is a perturbative version of our renormalisation scheme, as can be readily checked by a field expansion of our equations.…”
Section: Jhep03(2016)198supporting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our interpretation of this relation looks quite transparent and explicit to us, but we should point out that it is closely related to previous proposals in [20] and [17], respectively. The first proposal [20] is a perturbative version of our renormalisation scheme, as can be readily checked by a field expansion of our equations.…”
Section: Jhep03(2016)198supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Nevertheless, we should point out that below the unitarity bound singularities may arise at certain values of the momenta [17]. With this W , (4.6) has a unique solution, at least in some neighbourhood of the fixed point.…”
Section: Jhep03(2016)198mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations