2011
DOI: 10.1177/0959683610385961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holocene settlement shifts and palaeoenvironments on the Central Iranian Plateau: Investigating linked systems

Abstract: For thousands of years, humans have inhabited locations that are highly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, earthquakes, and floods. In order to investigate the extent to which Holocene environmental changes may have impacted on cultural evolution, we present new geologic, geomorphic, and chronologic data from the Qazvin Plain in northwest Iran that provides a backdrop of natural environmental changes for the simultaneous cultural dynamics observed on the Central Iranian Plateau. Well-resolved archaeo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These two extreme hypotheses raise the problem of the abandonment age of the alluvial fan at the precise location where the trench was excavated. Interestingly, this rate is comparable to the late Pleistocene-Holocene aggradation rates derived from alluvial sediments in similar deposition settings at southwestern Nebraska, Negev desert and Central Iran plateau (Daniels et al 2003;Guralnik et al 2011;Schmidt et al 2011). 1, see also figs 4a and 7 in Le Dortz et al 2009) at 0.8 m below the surface of another fan on the riser of a ≈4.5-m incised dry stream, suggests that its surface was abandoned some 9-10 ka ago at this site whereas the fan surface at the trench site cannot be older than 6.6 ka.…”
Section: A G E S O F T R E N C H U N I T Ssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…These two extreme hypotheses raise the problem of the abandonment age of the alluvial fan at the precise location where the trench was excavated. Interestingly, this rate is comparable to the late Pleistocene-Holocene aggradation rates derived from alluvial sediments in similar deposition settings at southwestern Nebraska, Negev desert and Central Iran plateau (Daniels et al 2003;Guralnik et al 2011;Schmidt et al 2011). 1, see also figs 4a and 7 in Le Dortz et al 2009) at 0.8 m below the surface of another fan on the riser of a ≈4.5-m incised dry stream, suggests that its surface was abandoned some 9-10 ka ago at this site whereas the fan surface at the trench site cannot be older than 6.6 ka.…”
Section: A G E S O F T R E N C H U N I T Ssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Firstly, more information is needed on local climate and environment. For example, the assertions that settlement on the Iranian Plateau was delayed due to unfavourable conditions (Schmidt et al, 2011), while settlement in the Fars region may have increased or changed during the 8.2 ka event (Nishiaki, 2010;Weeks, 2013), need to be checked against data from local climate records. Secondly, more site-specific detailed studies focusing on the ecological bases and strategies, like conducted for Sabi Abyad, are needed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the start of the occupation on the Iranian Plateau occurred from ca 8000 cal BP (long-lived samples) or 7500 cal BP (short-lived samples) (Fig. 5K) and may therefore be concurrent with increasing precipitation and humidity (Schmidt et al, 2011). This is an intriguing possibility, but more precisely dated local climate records and more archaeological 14 C-dates on short-lived samples are needed to assess this.…”
Section: Is There Evidence For Migration?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The OSL dates from the lowest part approximate the onset of this loess deposition between 3.1 ± 0.6 and 3.4 ± 0.1 ka (samples Turk OSL 1 and LUM 1, respectively). Comparative active loess depositions are reported from the Iranian plains and might point to more arid conditions . However, interpretation is difficult, because different reasons might cause the deposition of the loess layer, which here is up to several meters thick.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Comparative active loess depositions are reported from the Iranian plains and might point to more arid conditions. 43,57 However, interpretation is difficult, because different reasons might cause the deposition of the loess layer, which here is up to several meters thick. Reasons might be: (1) less vegetation or changing wind directions in the potential source areas, leading to intensified deflation, (2) more vegetation in the sink area, leading to more deposition, (3) the fluvial redeposition of loess, which is readily available in the lower Kopet Dag range, and (4) the alteration of vegetation or fluvial patterns by humans.…”
Section: Landscape Historical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%