1978
DOI: 10.4157/grj.51.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holocene Raised Coral Reefs of Kikai-Jima (Ryukyu Islands)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…0 conclude that Holocene terraces are the result of paleoseismic uplifts because the Great Alaskan earthquake of 1964 produced the lowest terrace of the series. This approach contrasts with that presented for Kikai Island in the Ryukyu arc for several Holocene reef terraces occurring from sea level up to about 10 m altitude [Nakata et al, 1978;Ota et al, 1978]. Shimazaki and Nakata [1980] equated each terrace with a single coseismic uplift event even though there were no contemporary uplifts that supported this assertion.…”
Section: Determination Of the Precise Ages Of Uplift Eventscontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…0 conclude that Holocene terraces are the result of paleoseismic uplifts because the Great Alaskan earthquake of 1964 produced the lowest terrace of the series. This approach contrasts with that presented for Kikai Island in the Ryukyu arc for several Holocene reef terraces occurring from sea level up to about 10 m altitude [Nakata et al, 1978;Ota et al, 1978]. Shimazaki and Nakata [1980] equated each terrace with a single coseismic uplift event even though there were no contemporary uplifts that supported this assertion.…”
Section: Determination Of the Precise Ages Of Uplift Eventscontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…Specifically, the differentiation between TI and TII occurred over 130 years, suggesting that a 7-m vertical displacement was caused by one or more large earthquakes approximately 2400 years ago. In contrast, the vertical displacements of Holocene terraces at islands located near the Ryukyu Trench, such as Kikai Island (28°N, 130°E), are generally less than 5 m (Nakata et al, 1978;Ota et al, 1978).…”
Section: Tectonicsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The type of uplifts near Kodakara Island may have been different from that experienced in areas located near trench zones, such as Kikai in the Ryukyu Islands (Ota et al, 1978(Ota et al, , 2000Sugihara et al, 2003) and the Huon peninsula of Papua New Guinea (e.g., Ota and Chappell, 1996). Because Kodakara is located on an inner arc and near the Tokara strait in the NWP, the uplifts near Kodakara Island may have been caused by subduction and lateral faults in the Tokara Channel (Konishi, 1965;Kizaki, 1978) and the extent of the Okinawa Trough (Kawana, 2001).…”
Section: Tectonicsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…On the other hand, the Tokara Channel does not correspond to the position with the maximum arc curvature and thus the relationship between the arc migration and the across-arc depressions is still unclear. Interestingly, the active uplifting of the arc crust has been happening at the Kikaijima Island located just south of the Tokara Channel (Ota et al 1978), resulting in a contrasting tectonic movement in a small area (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%