“…Many loess studies, particularly those conducted in the Negev desert of southern Israel, have focused, perhaps unintentionally, on ubiquitous, thick fluvial/colluvial reworked (or partially reworked) loess. The findings, however, have been treated as direct evidence of climatic eolian processes, rather than processes masked by the secondary fluvial activity [e.g., Bruins, 1976;Magaritz, 1986;Goodfriend and Magaritz, 1988;Avni et al, 2006;Kuster et al, 2006;Lai et al, 2007]. Such chronological and paleoenvironmental interpretations are problematic owing to the highly complex eolian/fluvial deposition/erosion histories, as was previously suggested for the loess in China [Stevens et al, 2006] and in Israel [Zilberman, 1992].…”