2006
DOI: 10.1191/0959683606hol977rp
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holocene evolution of the Haifa Bay area, Israel, and its influence on ancient tell settlements

Abstract: The geographical evolution of Haifa Bay and Zevulun Plain, Israel, from the late Pleistocene to the Holocene, is based on detailed analysis of drilled cores. At the beginning of the Holocene the Bay area was still under terrestrial conditions. Only about 9500 to 9000 cal. yr BP, when sea level rose to about 35 Á 30 m below present sea level (b.s.l.), did Nile-derived sand start to bypass the Carmel headland and Haifa Bay come into existence as a morphological feature. Between 8000 and 7150 cal. yr BP, when sea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(67 reference statements)
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Archaeological observations from the coast of Israel indicate that sea levels continued to rise until~6 ka to~7 ka when rates of sea level rise slowed considerably and the shoreline was located~3 km offshore from its current location. Sea level almost reached its present elevation at~4 ka (Sivan et al, 2001(Sivan et al, , 2004bAnzidei et al, 2011;Toker et al, 2012), and the coastline prograded to reach its present location at~3 ka (Kadosh et al, 2004;Cohen-Seffer et al, 2005;Zviely et al, 2006Zviely et al, , 2007Porat et al, 2008;Sivan et al, 2011).…”
Section: Regional Settingmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Archaeological observations from the coast of Israel indicate that sea levels continued to rise until~6 ka to~7 ka when rates of sea level rise slowed considerably and the shoreline was located~3 km offshore from its current location. Sea level almost reached its present elevation at~4 ka (Sivan et al, 2001(Sivan et al, , 2004bAnzidei et al, 2011;Toker et al, 2012), and the coastline prograded to reach its present location at~3 ka (Kadosh et al, 2004;Cohen-Seffer et al, 2005;Zviely et al, 2006Zviely et al, , 2007Porat et al, 2008;Sivan et al, 2011).…”
Section: Regional Settingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…While the topmost surface of the Pleistocene Kurkar unit has been chronologically constrained to between~101 and~50 ka (Engelmann et al, 2001;Frechen et al, 2004b;Sivan and Porat, 2004;Sivan et al, 2004a;Zviely et al, 2006;Roskin et al, 2015) there is no spatial pattern to the varying ages of the Kurkar ridges and the relationships between them and former sea-level changes have still not been properly established (Sivan and Porat, 2004;Mauz et al, 2013). Most of our understanding of the Kurkar, its chronology and morphology, comes from studies carried out on exposed terrestrial outcrops, leaving the extent and ages of the offshore submerged Kurkar mostly unknown.…”
Section: Regional Settingmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations