1981
DOI: 10.1016/0025-3227(81)90084-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holocene depositional history of a microtidal cuspate foreland cape: Cape Lookout, North Carolina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, even small gradients in alongshore sediment flux easily overwhelm rates of cross‐shore transport due to sea level changes [ Cowell et al , 1995]; a general landward shoreline retreat maintaining a defined shoreface during sea level rise could be superimposed without greatly altering the results shown here. During lowstands, abandoned cuspate shorelines [ Moslow and Heron , 1981] may remain until sea level rises again, affecting subsequent shoreline development, possibly “jumpstarting” the evolution of cuspate coasts. Model results show that, even on geologic timescales, regression and transgression could occur simultaneously along different portions of a cuspate coast even in the absence of a sediment source or along‐coast differences in rates of sea level change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even small gradients in alongshore sediment flux easily overwhelm rates of cross‐shore transport due to sea level changes [ Cowell et al , 1995]; a general landward shoreline retreat maintaining a defined shoreface during sea level rise could be superimposed without greatly altering the results shown here. During lowstands, abandoned cuspate shorelines [ Moslow and Heron , 1981] may remain until sea level rises again, affecting subsequent shoreline development, possibly “jumpstarting” the evolution of cuspate coasts. Model results show that, even on geologic timescales, regression and transgression could occur simultaneously along different portions of a cuspate coast even in the absence of a sediment source or along‐coast differences in rates of sea level change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the model does not explicitly include sea level changes, this suggests that several sea level highstands would be required for the capes to form from a hypothetical approximately straight coast. In this scenario, as sea level rises at the start of each interglacial period, the shoreline would likely intercept a variegated coast with existing cuspate shapes [ White , 1966; Moslow and Heron , 1981] that could be affected by river downcutting and deltaic deposition during glacial lowstands. Deltas, as well as inherited capes, could act as finite‐amplitude perturbations for the high‐angle wave instability.…”
Section: Model Predictions and Natural Wave Climatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many Holocene coastal depositional reconstructions have used radiocarbon dating of shell material included in shoreface sediment facies (Moslow and Heron, 1981;Nummendal, 1983). In southeastern Australia radiocarbon dates have provided the basis for chronological interpretation of Quaternary sea-level changes (Sloss et al, 2007;Lewis et al, 2013;Murray-Wallace and Woodroffe, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%