This article proposes a three-tier framework for analysing the politics of central bank independence. International factors explain the general trend towards central bank independence. However, they are framed differently by various national systems. At the national level, for heuristic purposes, the analysis can be structured by focusing on 'suppliers' and 'demanders' of central bank independence. The former are the political authorities, whereas the latter are socioeconomic forces and interest groups, with the central bank positioned in-between. At the micro-institutional level, central banks can be influential economic and political actors situated at the interface between levels of governance. The added value of this integrated framework is appraised using one case study, the Bank of Italy's path to independence, which is compared with the experience of the Bank of England and the Bundesbank. In contrast to many works on central bank independence, the methodology adopted here is qualitative, rather than quantitative, and is grounded in empirical research.Central banks are complex and multi-faceted institutions, which stand at the interface between politics and economics, states and markets, international and national governance. The interlocking dimensions of these institutions have been reflected by a variegated academic literature, which had initially been confined to economics but which was later developed by political economists, until eventually being rediscovered by political scientists.The review of the state of the art literature on the politics of central bank independence reveals that explanations have generally been sought either at national or international level, with limited attempts to integrate both dimensions. Furthermore, a third level of analysis investigating the resources, preferences and strategies of the central banks has remained