2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10337-013-2420-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hollow-Fibre Liquid-Phase Microextraction for the Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Johannesburg Jukskei River, South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
10
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Das et al (24) also looked at PAHs in a shallow lake (Zeekoevlei lake) in the Western Cape Province and found total concentrations of 19.16 ng −1 in winter and 0.09 ng −1 in summer. These reported concentrations are much lower than those of Sibiya et al (17,18). The different total concentrations reported highlight the different sources and fate of these compounds in the environment.…”
Section: Total Pahscontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Das et al (24) also looked at PAHs in a shallow lake (Zeekoevlei lake) in the Western Cape Province and found total concentrations of 19.16 ng −1 in winter and 0.09 ng −1 in summer. These reported concentrations are much lower than those of Sibiya et al (17,18). The different total concentrations reported highlight the different sources and fate of these compounds in the environment.…”
Section: Total Pahscontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Total concentrations of PAHs determined from river water from the Venda region rank third (11.5-142.8 μg −1 ). Total concentrations reported by Sibiya et al (17,18) from surface waters in the Johannesburg area with ranges of 0.173-2.400 μg −1 and 0.257-0.886 μg −1 are the lowest. Das et al (24) also looked at PAHs in a shallow lake (Zeekoevlei lake) in the Western Cape Province and found total concentrations of 19.16 ng −1 in winter and 0.09 ng −1 in summer.…”
Section: Total Pahsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In recent years, both 2p-HF-LPME [19,20] and 3p-HF-LPME [21][22][23][24] have been, respectively, applied for various sample preparation procedures because of major advantages such as simplicity, comparable sensitivity, low solvent consumption, high enrichment, low cost and excellent sample clean-up [25]. In addition, HF-LPME can tolerate a wide pH range and avoid cross-contamination of samples because the fibres are inexpensive enough to dispose of after each use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%