Abstract:Here, we present a method for measuring barbiturates (butalbital, secobarbital, pentobarbital, and phenobarbital) in whole blood samples. To accomplish these measurements, analytes were extracted by means of hollow-fiber liquid-phase microextraction in the three-phase mode. Hollow-fiber pores were filled with decanol, and a solution of sodium hydroxide (pH 13) was introduced into the lumen of the fiber (acceptor phase). The fiber was submersed in the acidified blood sample, and the system was subjected to an u… Show more
“…The proposed method exhibited an excellent response within a linear range of 1−100 nM for the accurate quantification of pentobarbital, secobarbital, amobarbital, butalbital, and phenobarbital and high reproducibility for the separation of the drug mixture. Notably, the LODs (S/N = 3) of pentobarbital, secobarbital, amobarbital, butalbital, and phenobarbital achieved by the proposed system were lower than those reported using other methods (Table 2) [5, 32–35]. USA‐DLLME demonstrated excellent sample clean‐up capability and simplicity of operation.…”
This study developed a facile, highly sensitive technique for extracting and quantifying barbiturates in serum samples. This method combined ultrasound and surfactant‐assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction with poly(ethylene oxide)‐mediated stacking in capillary electrophoresis. Factors influencing the extraction and stacking performance, such as the type and volume of extraction solvents, the type and concentration of surfactant, extraction time, salt additives, sample matrix, solution pH, and composition of the background electrolyte, were carefully studied and optimized to achieve the optimal detection sensitivity. Under the optimized extraction (injecting 140 μL C2H4Cl2 into 1 mL of sample with pH 4 (5 mM sodium phosphate containing 0.05 mM Tween 20 and sonication for 1 min) and separation conditions (150 mM tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane‐borate with pH 8.5 containing 0.5% (m/v) poly(ethylene oxide)), the limits of detection (signal‐to‐noise ratio = 3) of five barbiturates ranged from 0.20 to 0.33 ng/mL, and the calculated sensitivity improvement ranged from 868‐ to 1700‐fold. The experimental results revealed excellent linearity (R2 > 0.99), with relative standard deviations of 2.1%–3.4% for the migration time and 4.3%–5.7% for the peak area. The recoveries of the spiked serum samples were 97.1% –110.3%. Our proposed approach offers a rapid and practical method for quantifying barbiturates in biological fluids.
“…The proposed method exhibited an excellent response within a linear range of 1−100 nM for the accurate quantification of pentobarbital, secobarbital, amobarbital, butalbital, and phenobarbital and high reproducibility for the separation of the drug mixture. Notably, the LODs (S/N = 3) of pentobarbital, secobarbital, amobarbital, butalbital, and phenobarbital achieved by the proposed system were lower than those reported using other methods (Table 2) [5, 32–35]. USA‐DLLME demonstrated excellent sample clean‐up capability and simplicity of operation.…”
This study developed a facile, highly sensitive technique for extracting and quantifying barbiturates in serum samples. This method combined ultrasound and surfactant‐assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction with poly(ethylene oxide)‐mediated stacking in capillary electrophoresis. Factors influencing the extraction and stacking performance, such as the type and volume of extraction solvents, the type and concentration of surfactant, extraction time, salt additives, sample matrix, solution pH, and composition of the background electrolyte, were carefully studied and optimized to achieve the optimal detection sensitivity. Under the optimized extraction (injecting 140 μL C2H4Cl2 into 1 mL of sample with pH 4 (5 mM sodium phosphate containing 0.05 mM Tween 20 and sonication for 1 min) and separation conditions (150 mM tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane‐borate with pH 8.5 containing 0.5% (m/v) poly(ethylene oxide)), the limits of detection (signal‐to‐noise ratio = 3) of five barbiturates ranged from 0.20 to 0.33 ng/mL, and the calculated sensitivity improvement ranged from 868‐ to 1700‐fold. The experimental results revealed excellent linearity (R2 > 0.99), with relative standard deviations of 2.1%–3.4% for the migration time and 4.3%–5.7% for the peak area. The recoveries of the spiked serum samples were 97.1% –110.3%. Our proposed approach offers a rapid and practical method for quantifying barbiturates in biological fluids.
“…Based on the previous exploration of the critical role of FLU extraction methods on their assay results, [42][43][44][45] several reports have focused on the optimization of extraction methods. In response to the apparent limitations of conventional analytical methods for FLU and its metabolites, Nguyen and colleagues optimized and improved the conventional SPE-GC-MS method for the detection of FLU and its metabolites in urine.…”
Flunitrazepam, a very potent benzodiazepine with sedative, hypnotic and amnesic effects, is commonly used to treat severe insomnia and as an anesthetic. Due to these characteristics, when flunitrazepam is sneaked into alcohol or drinks, it is often highly associated with violent behavior and drug rape cases. Therefore, it is also known as a “date rape drug”, and the detection of flunitrazepam and its metabolites is of great interest in forensic medicine and pharmacotoxicology. This paper describes the mechanism of action and drug metabolism process of flunitrazepam, reviews the different methods for detecting flunitrazepam published over the years, summarizes the detection limits of each method and compares their advantages and disadvantages. We hope to provide some inspiration for future research in this field.
“…In recent decades, the analysis of barbiturates has attracted extensive attention worldwide, and several methods such as ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy (UV-Vis) [8], capillary electrophoresis (CE) [9,10,11,12], liquid chromatography (LC) [13,14], liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) [15], and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) [16,17,18,19,20] have been reported for the determination of barbiturates in biological specimens. Traditional technologies such as UV-Vis spectroscopy is still widely used in forensic science for its convenience but it lacks specificity and sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, LPME, which is considered as a “green” extraction technique, has attracted widespread attention for its good purification capability, economical efficiency, and easy operation [18,28,29,30,31,34]. Until now, LPME has already been applied in the purification and enrichment steps in different biological samples [8,16,18,23,34]. For example, Zarei et al adopted a dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) technique combined with spectrophotometric analysis for the determination of trace amounts of barbituric acid in human serum [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Zarei et al adopted a dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) technique combined with spectrophotometric analysis for the determination of trace amounts of barbituric acid in human serum [8]. Hollow fiber–liquid phase microextraction (HF-LPME) was also developed to isolate barbiturates in hair [18], blood [16], and liver samples [35], and coupled with GC-MS, satisfactory results can be reached.…”
The wide abuse of barbiturates has aroused extensive public concern. Therefore, the determination of such drugs is becoming essential in therapeutic drug monitoring and forensic science. Herein, a simple, efficient, and inexpensive sample preparation technique, namely, flat membrane-based liquid-phase microextraction (FM-LPME) followed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), was used to determine barbiturates in biological specimens. Factors that may influence the efficiency including organic extraction solvent, pH, and composition of donor and acceptor phases, extraction time, and salt addition to the sample (donor phase) were investigated and optimized. Under the optimized extraction conditions, the linear ranges of the proposed FM-LPME/LC-MS method (with correlation coefficient factors ≥ 0.99) were 7.5–750 ng mL−1 for whole blood, 5.0–500 ng mL−1 for urine, and 25–2500 ng g−1 for liver. Repeatability between 5.0 and 13.7% was obtained and the limit of detection (LOD) values ranged from 1.5 to 3.1 ng mL−1, from 0.6 to 3.6 ng mL−1, and from 5.2 to 10.0 ng g−1 for whole blood, urine, and liver samples, respectively. This method was successfully applied for the analysis of barbiturates in blood and liver from rats treated with these drugs, and excellent sample cleanup was achieved.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.