2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.01.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hollow fiber dead-end ultrafiltration: Axial transport variations during humic acid filtration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar observations for dead-end filtration, where an initially high rejection reduces with filtration time, were reported by van de Ven et. al [39].…”
Section: Influence Of the Feed Phmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similar observations for dead-end filtration, where an initially high rejection reduces with filtration time, were reported by van de Ven et. al [39].…”
Section: Influence Of the Feed Phmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Due to the low axial flow over the length of the fiber (which declines over the length of the fiber), the material is transported to the end. We presented this mechanism and showed visual evidence for the local deposition of humic material in our previous work [14]. We showed in that work that the retention in the early part of the module for humic acid can be as high as 95% which is far greater than would be expected based on the pore size (25 nm) and the molar mass of the humic material.…”
Section: Sodium Alginate and Humic Acidmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…For the fluxes of 30 and higher, the relation between resistance flux has been extensively described in our work on the filtration of alginate in different ionic environments [20]. For humic acid solutions, the resistance decreases with increasing flux until a plateau is reached, which we showed to be due to a decrease in retention with increasing filtered volume [14]. Fig.…”
Section: Sodium Alginate and Humic Acidmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PES has been successfully used in making asymmetric UF membranes with different pore morphologies (26)(27)(28). However, pure PES membranes possessed hydrophobic surface and high fouling nature, which ultimately caused low fluxes with their usage (29). To overcome this limitation, the PES membrane is blended with hydrophilic and inorganic additives to modify the surface and structure of the membrane, which improved the flux (12,15,(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%