2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta03167j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hollow bimetallic cobalt-based selenide polyhedrons derived from metal–organic framework: an efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for overall water splitting

Abstract: Hollow bimetallic cobalt-based selenide polyhedrons MxCo1−xSe2 were successfully synthesized by a simple solvothermal strategy using bimetallic MOFs as template. This catalyst exhibits excellent electrocatalytic performance for overall water splitting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
84
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As displayed in Figure a, MoO 2 P x NSs/P‐MWCNTs exhibits a sharp onset of HER current (−27 mV), while the other catalysts afford both obviously lower onset potentials and slower HER current densities at all potentials except Pt/C. In addition, the over‐potential at 10 mA cm −2 is another criterion to estimate the electrocatalytic activity of materials . As shown in Figure S7 and Table S1, the over‐potential of MoO 2 P x NSs/P‐MWCNTs is only 57 mV at 10 mA cm −2 , which is the smallest among all the catalysts except Pt/C (35 mV for Pt/C, 332 mV for P‐MoO 2 , 406 mV for P‐MWCNTs, 537 mV for MoO 2 , and 686 mV for MWCNTs).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As displayed in Figure a, MoO 2 P x NSs/P‐MWCNTs exhibits a sharp onset of HER current (−27 mV), while the other catalysts afford both obviously lower onset potentials and slower HER current densities at all potentials except Pt/C. In addition, the over‐potential at 10 mA cm −2 is another criterion to estimate the electrocatalytic activity of materials . As shown in Figure S7 and Table S1, the over‐potential of MoO 2 P x NSs/P‐MWCNTs is only 57 mV at 10 mA cm −2 , which is the smallest among all the catalysts except Pt/C (35 mV for Pt/C, 332 mV for P‐MoO 2 , 406 mV for P‐MWCNTs, 537 mV for MoO 2 , and 686 mV for MWCNTs).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang and et al synthesized an actiniae-like carbon nanotube assembly (3D-CNTA) as a catalyst for electrocatalytic water splitting, which is also derived from ZIF-67. The water electrolyzer also exhibits stable performance under the operating cell voltage 1.68 V for 10 h. Besides the above two examples, there are also reported works on ZIF-67-derived CoP x /carbon composites, [61,109,110] CoSe x / carbon composites, [51,62,[111][112][113] CoS x /carbon composites, [114] cobalt-doped carbon nanotubes, [115][116][117] and other Co-doped carbon matrices. carbon core-shell particles on the tips of the nanotubes (see Figure 10).…”
Section: Overall Water Splittingmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As shown in Fig. 4b [49][50][51] In addition to catalytic activity, stability is another critical factor to evaluate a good electrocatalyst, we investigated the stability of Co-FeS 2 /CoS 2 heterostructures via 1000 cycles scanning. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: -25mentioning
confidence: 99%