“…The value of our findings is that they contribute to an evolving collection of research findings over the past three decades (see, for example, Peters, 1974;Smart, 1982;Smart & Thompson, 2001;Umbach, 2006) that collectively aid in understanding the importance of disciplinary-based academic environments in contributing to what students do and do not learn as a result of their college experiences and the socialization mechanisms of those environments by which faculty members reinforce and reward students for their display of different repertoires of attitudes, interests, and abilities in their interactions with students, both in classroom and more informal out-of-class settings. For example, Reardon and Bullock (2004) recently described a three-tiered ''service-delivery model'' where they use Holland's theory to assist academic advisors and career counselors in their efforts to help students make more informed choices among alternative academic majors and career options. They argue that ''If students can use Holland's theoretical model to recognize, differentiate, and understand these diverse academic environments and the faculty members who dominate them, we believe they are more likely to find a place within the university where their satisfaction, involvement, and persistence will be increased'' (p. 111).…”