2019
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01812-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holistic word context does not influence holistic processing of artificial objects in an interleaved composite task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that the same finding was replicated in the second experiment, in that RTs were faster to eight letter words than other categories regardless of colors (i.e., blue vs. green), suggesting that white, green, and blue colors interfere word processing speed in cerebral cortex and modulate the influence of selective attention. These findings supported the previous interpretation of white colored words, by suggesting that the competition between specific colors (i.e., white, blue, green) and words lead to reverse the selective attention effect in cerebral hemispheres, and increase the RT with the increment of word length, suggesting that words are processed holistically (Ventura et al, 2019;Wong et al, 2019;Carlos et al, 2019;Martin et al, 2012;Maurer, Rossion & McCandliss, 2008), and colors modulate visual processing in the cerebral hemisphere (Sun et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It is worth noting that the same finding was replicated in the second experiment, in that RTs were faster to eight letter words than other categories regardless of colors (i.e., blue vs. green), suggesting that white, green, and blue colors interfere word processing speed in cerebral cortex and modulate the influence of selective attention. These findings supported the previous interpretation of white colored words, by suggesting that the competition between specific colors (i.e., white, blue, green) and words lead to reverse the selective attention effect in cerebral hemispheres, and increase the RT with the increment of word length, suggesting that words are processed holistically (Ventura et al, 2019;Wong et al, 2019;Carlos et al, 2019;Martin et al, 2012;Maurer, Rossion & McCandliss, 2008), and colors modulate visual processing in the cerebral hemisphere (Sun et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This congruency effect for word stimuli has now been replicated numerous times (e.g., Chen et al, 2016; Ventura et al, 2017, 2019, 2020; Wong et al, 2012) and clearly indicates that participants have difficulty constraining attention to part of a word. As discussed by Ventura (2014), this result is not altogether surprising given that the neural architecture that supports reading (i.e., the visual word form area [VWFA]) may have developed to support other holistic visual processes like face recognition (see also Dehaene, 2005; but see Ventura et al, 2019 for evidence that different neural mechanisms may underlie the holistic processing of words and faces). What is surprising, however, is that Wong et al (2011) reported a greater congruency effect for low-frequency words relative to high-frequency words.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…One method that has been used extensively to assess holistic processing (and is used in the current study) is the composite task (Hole, 1994; Young et al, 1987). Importantly, this task, which was originally developed for face stimuli, has been useful in assessing holistic processing in a range of categories (Gauthier et al, 1998), which now includes words (Chen et al, 2016; Ventura et al, 2019; Wong et al, 2011). In Wong et al’s (2011) experiments, participants were first shown a study word with a vertical line at its centre (e.g., “la|dy”) and were told to hold this word in memory (the sequence of events is shown in Figure 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These context effects were previously found by Richler, Bukach, and Gauthier (2009) with faces and Greebles. Ventura et al (2019) used a different type of artificial objects, Ziggerins (Wong et al, 2009), and found no evidence that an aligned word (which is processed holistically) induces a stronger congruency effect on artificial objects than on aligned pseudowords (which are not processed holistically). Given the time one trial takes in this task (but in accordance with those used by Richler et al, 2009), holistic word processing may reflect rather late linguistic, lexical/ orthographic processes, which may not be abstract enough to allow an influence on other, nonlinguistic categories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Ventura et al (2017) showed that the composite effect was similar for the three types of words, suggesting an involvement at the level of abstract lexical representations. In a second study, Ventura et al (2019), evaluated whether contextually induced congruency effects can occur within a single trial between words and artificial objects. These context effects were previously found by Richler, Bukach, and Gauthier (2009) with faces and Greebles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%