Holistic Trust Design of E-Services

Presti, Stéphane Lo; Butler, Michael; Leuschel, Michaël; Booth, Chris

doi:10.4018/978-1-59904-207-7.ch005

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Trust factors, such as credibility, ease of use or risk, have been elicited in e-commerce [5] offering design and (web) interface elements and models of trust that can be used as starting points for HCI developers. Design methodologies of pervasive systems have been augmented with trust requirements [10] such as audit trail (or accountability), harm, reliability and accuracy. Other work has focused on topics such as website credibility [7] and reputation [9], [17].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Also all the data which are exchanged within the platform are integrityprotected, using typically a keyed-Hash Message Authentication Code (HMAC), and possibly bound to particular software configurations if Proof-Carrying Code (PCC) or Trusted Computing are used. In that case, cryptographic keys can be hardware-protected in the Trusted Platform Module and secure channels are reinforced via mutual attestation of software configurations on both sides of the communication (a detailed account of the use of Trusted Computing for this purpose is given in [10]). …”

Section: B Trust Assessment Platformmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Web Service Trust: Towards a Dynamic Assessment Framework

Spanoudakis

LoPresti

2009

2009 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Trust in software services is a key prerequisite for the success and wide adoption of Services-Oriented Computing (SOC) in an open Internet world. However, trust is poorly assessed by existing methods and technologies, especially in dynamically composed and deployed SOC systems. In this paper, we discuss current methods for assessing trust in Service-Oriented Computing and identify gaps of current platforms, in particular with regards to runtime trust assessment. To address these gaps, we propose a model of runtime trust assessment of software services and introduce a framework for realizing the model. A key characteristic of our approach is the support that it offers for customizable assessment of trust based on evidence collected during the operation of software services and its ability to combine this evidence with subjective assessments coming from service clients.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: B Trust Assessment Platformmentioning

confidence: 99%

Web Service Trust: Towards a Dynamic Assessment Framework

Spanoudakis

LoPresti

2009

2009 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Trust in some works is treated as an ad-hoc operational feature, and that treatment tends to be more difficult and costly [36]. When trust requirements are not considered in a consistent way from the early stages of the software development, but in an ad-hoc way, they will result in conflicts with the other functional and non functional requirements of the system.…”

Section: Positioningmentioning

confidence: 99%

Practitioner's challenges in designing trust into online systems

Mouratidis

Cofta

2010

J. theor. appl. electron. commer. res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is widely recognised that successful online systems are not those that simply fulfil some functional specifications, but rather systems that are developed to also meet a number of non-functional requirements such as security, reliability and trust. It is also generally accepted that the development of quality online systems is not anymore just the task of single individuals or mono-cultural teams but it often involves diverse and disperse teams with members from different cultures and backgrounds. Some non-functional requirements (such as security or reliability) enjoy a general consensus, independent of the cultural background of the developers. Unfortunately, this is not the case for trust, despite the growing interest in trustworthy information systems. The very nature of trust indicates that it is understood differently by different individuals and relates to personal experiences more than other non-functional requirements. In this paper we identify the field of study to support the inclusion of considerations regarding trust in the design of online systems, to provide the understanding and support that is in par with security or reliability.

show abstract

A survey on IoT trust model frameworks

Ferraris,

Fernandez-Gago,

Roman

et al. 2023

J Supercomput

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Trust can be considered as a multidisciplinary concept, which is strongly related to the context and it falls in different fields such as Philosophy, Psychology or Computer Science. Trust is fundamental in every relationship, because without it, an entity will not interact with other entities. This aspect is very important especially in the Internet of Things (IoT), where many entities produced by different vendors and created for different purposes have to interact among them through the internet often under uncertainty. Trust can overcome this uncertainty, creating a strong basis to ease the process of interaction among these entities. We believe that considering trust in the IoT is fundamental, and in order to implement it in any IoT entity, it is fundamental to consider it through the whole System Development Life Cycle. In this paper, we propose an analysis of different works that consider trust for the IoT. We will focus especially on the analysis of frameworks that have been developed in order to include trust in the IoT. We will make a classification of them providing a set of parameters that we believe are fundamental in order to properly consider trust in the IoT. Thus, we will identify important aspects to be taken into consideration when developing frameworks that implement trust in the IoT, finding gaps and proposing possible solutions.

show abstract

Holistic Trust Design of E-Services

Cited by 5 publications

References 17 publications

Web Service Trust: Towards a Dynamic Assessment Framework

Web Service Trust: Towards a Dynamic Assessment Framework

Practitioner's challenges in designing trust into online systems

A survey on IoT trust model frameworks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About