2020
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holistic Optimization of Bioinformatic Analysis Pipeline for Detection and Quantification of 2′-O-Methylations in RNA by RiboMethSeq

Abstract: A major trend in the epitranscriptomics field over the last 5 years has been the highthroughput analysis of RNA modifications by a combination of specific chemical treatment (s), followed by library preparation and deep sequencing. Multiple protocols have been described for several important RNA modifications, such as 5-methylcytosine (m 5 C), pseudouridine (y), 1-methyladenosine (m 1 A), and 2′-O-methylation (Nm). One commonly used method is the alkaline cleavage-based RiboMethSeq protocol, where positions of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RiboMeth-seq was performed using the Illumina sequencing technology and raw data were processed as previously described ( 14 , 25 ). The median number of total reads reaches 7.2 millions after trimming, these reads being aligned on the 7.2 kb-long rRNA sequences, that corresponds to the optimal sequencing depth ( 14 , 26 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RiboMeth-seq was performed using the Illumina sequencing technology and raw data were processed as previously described ( 14 , 25 ). The median number of total reads reaches 7.2 millions after trimming, these reads being aligned on the 7.2 kb-long rRNA sequences, that corresponds to the optimal sequencing depth ( 14 , 26 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These counts for A, C and G are used for local normalization of the U cleavages to background (NormUcount, see Materials and Methods), to account for local accessibility of different RNA regions. Further bioinformatic steps of analysis are similar to the well-established RiboMethSeq procedure ( 54 ), and allow calculation of scores termed ScoreMEAN, ScoreA and ScoreC for Ucleavage profiles, where ψ residues appear as protected positions (similarly to Nm residues in RiboMethSeq).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resulting U profiles were used for calculation of ’RiboMethSeq-like’ scores (ScoreMEAN, A, B and PsiScore, equivalent to ScoreC in RiboMethSeq). Window of four neighboring nucleotides (±2 nt) was used for score calculation ( 54 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These rRNA sequences were thus corrected to fit to the observed sequencing data (Supplementary Information and Methods). Then, in order to map all possible candidate sites, we performed the same approach as reported in [ 30 ]. We used threshold values for ScoreMEAN and Score A2, respectively 0.93 and 0.5; although in some cases, less strict ScoreMEAN limit (0.92 or lower) was applied.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%