2004
DOI: 10.1179/147842204225016949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holistic model for atmospheric corrosion Part 5 – Factors controlling deposition of salt aerosol on candles, plates and buildings

Abstract: This paper is the fifth in a series of papers outlining a holistic model of atmospheric corrosion. Previous papers have outlined how the airborne salinity could be estimated at any given location. This paper presents a theoretical analysis of aerosol/particulate deposition, in conjunction with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies. Theoretical and CFD studies address whether salt aerosol/particulate deposition is controlled by mean winds, wind turbulence or Brownian motion (deposition of salt via rain/fog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the ratios of the chloride content in the wash-off to the average daily airborne salinity are shown in parentheses. The deposition rate onto a salt candle (which determines airborne salinity) differs from that of an exposed plate, as outlined by Cole et al 4 In fact, for small aerosols (,15 mm) deposition onto a plate is likely to be more efficient (y40%), while for large aerosols (.15 mm) deposition onto a salt candle is likely to be more efficient (again by y40 %). This difference was taken into account when estimating the average number of days required to accumulate the salt observed in the wash-off for the different site classes, as presented in Table 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the ratios of the chloride content in the wash-off to the average daily airborne salinity are shown in parentheses. The deposition rate onto a salt candle (which determines airborne salinity) differs from that of an exposed plate, as outlined by Cole et al 4 In fact, for small aerosols (,15 mm) deposition onto a plate is likely to be more efficient (y40%), while for large aerosols (.15 mm) deposition onto a salt candle is likely to be more efficient (again by y40 %). This difference was taken into account when estimating the average number of days required to accumulate the salt observed in the wash-off for the different site classes, as presented in Table 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present paper focuses on the initial reaction of a wet aerosol with a metal surface and how the impact conditions determine the morphology of salt deposits. Previous papers [1][2][3][4][5] have developed a methodology for predicting airborne salt aerosol content and surface aerosol flux based on a knowledge of salinity sources and transport processes, and the rate of deposition of this marine aerosol onto salt candles, surfaces and buildings. However, to develop an accurate understanding of how deposited pollutants react with the surface, it is necessary to have an understanding of the form of such deposits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown inTable 1, chloride concentration measured in the Province of Western Coast (Red Sea) is generally high.Frasan, Hakal and Wajah shows the highest salinity values: 740, 704 and 608 mg m 22 d 21 Cl 2 respectively, which belong to categories S 3 (the rest belong to S 2 ). These results show that atmospheric salinity depends on the wind pattern at each specific site 10,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. The main part of anthropogenic SO 2 pollution is caused by combustion of fossil fuels and algae decomposition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%