Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2017 2017
DOI: 10.5244/c.31.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holistic, Instance-level Human Parsing

Abstract: Object parsing -the task of decomposing an object into its semantic parts -has traditionally been formulated as a category-level segmentation problem. Consequently, when there are multiple objects in an image, current methods cannot count the number of objects in the scene, nor can they determine which part belongs to which object. We address this problem by segmenting the parts of objects at an instance-level, such that each pixel in the image is assigned a part label, as well as the identity of the object it… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(111 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With multi-scale feature connections and iterative refinement, the parsing and pose tasks boosted each other simultaneously. Considering the practical application, several current works (Li, Arnab, and Torr 2017;Li et al 2017a;Zhao et al 2018) focus on handling the scenario with multiple persons. Usually, it consisted of three sequential steps: object detection (He et al 2017), object segmentation and part segmentation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With multi-scale feature connections and iterative refinement, the parsing and pose tasks boosted each other simultaneously. Considering the practical application, several current works (Li, Arnab, and Torr 2017;Li et al 2017a;Zhao et al 2018) focus on handling the scenario with multiple persons. Usually, it consisted of three sequential steps: object detection (He et al 2017), object segmentation and part segmentation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean IoU(%) LIP [14] 59.36 Structure-evolving LSTM [24] 63.57 DeepLab v2 [2] 64.94 Li et al [22] 66.3 Fang et al [12] 67.60 PGN [13] 68.4 RefineNet [30] 68.6 Bilinski et al [1] 68.6 DeepLab v3+ [3] 67.84 Multi-task Learning 68.13 Graphonomy (CIHP) 71.14 Graphonomy (Universal Human Parsing) 69.12 Table 1. Comparison of human parsing performance with several state-of-the-art methods on PASCAL-Person-Part dataset [6].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most straightforward solution to universal human parsing would be posing it as a multi-task learning problem, and integrating multiple segmentation branches upon one shared backbone network [2,14,22,25,28]. This line of research only considers the brute-force feature-level information sharing while disregarding the underlying common semantic knowledge, such as label hierarchy, label visual similarity, and linguistic/context correlations.…”
Section: Inter-graph Connectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This supported their hypothesis that most of the training data for a pixel-level task is statistically correlated within an image, and that randomly sampling a much smaller set of pixels is sufficient. Moreover, [47] and [48] showed improved results by respectively sampling only 6% and 12% of the hardest pixels, instead of all of them, in fully-supervised training. [49] and MCG [50] (b).…”
Section: Training With Weaker Supervisionmentioning
confidence: 99%