Holiday Pictures or Blockbuster Movies? Insights into Copyright Infringement in User Uploads to One-Click File Hosters

Abstract

Abstract. According to copyright holders, One-Click Hosters (OCHs) such as Megaupload are frequently used to host and distribute copyright infringing content. This has spurred numerous initiatives by legislators, law enforcement and content producers. Due to a lack of representative data sets that properly capture private uses of OCHs (such as sharing holiday pictures among friends), to date, there are no reliable estimates of the proportion of legitimate and infringing files being uploaded to OCHs. This situation leaves the field to the partisan arguments brought forward by copyright owners and OCHs. In this paper, we provide empirical data about the uses and misuses of OCHs by analysing six large data sets containing file metadata that we extracted from a range of popular OCHs. We assess the status of these files with regard to copyright infringement and show that at least 26 % to 79 % of them are potentially infringing. Perhaps surprising after the shutdown by the FBI for alleged copyright infringement, we found Megaupload to have the second highest proportion of legitimate files in our study.

Insights of file-sharing system forums

“…There is strong indication that a large portion of the files hosted on these systems are unauthorised copies of copyrighted material [4]. The distribution of content was also found to be similar to that available on other systems such as BitTorrent [5].…”

“…However, the most duplicated URL had up to 940 reposts but appeared to be spam. 4 This specific URL was pointing to a dead page at the time we manually checked it.…”

“…Finally, [4] studied the legal nature of content hosted on 1-CFHSs. The authors found that these systems were largely used to disseminate illegal content, with up to 79 % of the content identified as unauthorised copies of entertainment or software products.…”

A First Look at Zoombombing

“…Authentication-wise, the security model of online meeting services is the following: anyone with an account on the platform and who knows the meeting ID can join the meeting. This is not dissimilar to other security sensitive services that have been studied by the community in the past, from online document editing [18] to file download platforms [19]. To prevent anyone knowing the meeting ID from joining a room, Zoom, Webex, GotoMeeting, and Blue-jeans allow hosts to specify a password participants need to provide upon joining.…”

Who Watches the Watchmen: Exploring Complaints on the Web

“…Despite several anti-piracy efforts through the injection of fake content on BitTorrent portals [14,15,17,30] and the shutdown of file hosters services [34], about 90% of files shared using BitTorrent protocol are judged to be infringing [40,57]. Furthermore, 80% of files shared through file hosters are also in the same category [33]. Ibosiola et al measured the availability of illegal content on streaming cyberlockers [27].…”