1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.56.11769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hole photoproduction in insulating copper oxide

Abstract: Basing on t-J model we calculate the k-dependence of a single hole photoproduction probability for CuO2 plane at zero doping. We also discuss the radiation of spin-waves which can substantially deform the shape of photoemission spectra.Comment: latex 8 pages, 3 figure

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
117
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(36 reference statements)
3
117
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5c); the exciton QP displays a steep drop in intensity as (p/2,p/2) is crossed. This is a generic feature predicted for a hole in a t-J model within an SCBA approach 41 and indirectly inferred from ARPES measurements on cuprates 42 . Although some deviations from the cuprate physics might have been expected on general grounds due to fundamentally different nature of a hole and an exciton, and material-specific differences between Sr 2 IrO 4 and cuprates, the striking agreement down to a level of fine details with theories constructed for hole dynamics in cuprates demonstrates excellent parallel between the low-energy physics of Sr 2 IrO 4 and the cuprates.…”
Section: Article Nature Communications | Doi: 101038/ncomms5453mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5c); the exciton QP displays a steep drop in intensity as (p/2,p/2) is crossed. This is a generic feature predicted for a hole in a t-J model within an SCBA approach 41 and indirectly inferred from ARPES measurements on cuprates 42 . Although some deviations from the cuprate physics might have been expected on general grounds due to fundamentally different nature of a hole and an exciton, and material-specific differences between Sr 2 IrO 4 and cuprates, the striking agreement down to a level of fine details with theories constructed for hole dynamics in cuprates demonstrates excellent parallel between the low-energy physics of Sr 2 IrO 4 and the cuprates.…”
Section: Article Nature Communications | Doi: 101038/ncomms5453mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [7,8,9]), but basically it is the t − J model. Superconducting pairing in the t − J model induced by spin-wave exchange has been considered in the papers [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no sign of such electron pockets in our ARPES data from underdoped YBCOK2, nor are there signs of extra zonefolding due to the kinds of density wave instabilities that might give rise to such a Fermi surface reconstruction 8,9,15 . If any pocket had to be postulated on the basis of the present ARPES data, the most obvious possibility would be that the Fermi arcs are in fact hole-like nodal Fermi pockets, as obtained for light doping of the antiferromagnetic parent compound in selfconsistent Born calculations 26 and already speculated from the study of other underdoped cuprates [4][5][6] . The lack of a finite ARPES intensity on the outer side of the pockets would be consistent with the strong drop in the quasiparticle coherence Z k expected beyond the antiferromagnetic zone boundary 13,27 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%