2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-019-0436-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hole exit damage and tool wear during the drilling of CFRP with a double-point angle drill

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tool must travel deeper axially to allow for the remainder of the diameter to be machined. This results in the CD856 double-point angle design experiencing a lower thrust force and agrees well with thrust profiles determined in the research done by Li et al, who determined lower thrust and improved hole quality in comparison to standard twist drill geometries [ 54 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The tool must travel deeper axially to allow for the remainder of the diameter to be machined. This results in the CD856 double-point angle design experiencing a lower thrust force and agrees well with thrust profiles determined in the research done by Li et al, who determined lower thrust and improved hole quality in comparison to standard twist drill geometries [ 54 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…34 In addition, a double-pointed angle drill has less impact on the CFRP drilling hole wall and drill-exit damage. 44 However, compared with the above tools, the modified drill bit with clip-edges structure has smaller thrust force (about 45 N, the others are 70–160 N), a longer tool life, and does not need to change the drilling parameters and equipment. In summary, the modified one-shot drill bit has many advantages.…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the diamond bit had broken, fallen off and adhered to wear after drilling four 7mm thick holes. The above results show that there are problems such as poor quality of hole wall, easy wear of tool, easy edge chipping at hole entrance, ber cracking and delamination in carbon ceramic drilling [11][12][13][14]. Wang et al [15] conducted a comparative test on the hole-making quality and cutting temperature of C/E composite materials by drilling and helical milling under the same cutting speed and processing e ciency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%