2004
DOI: 10.1207/s15427579jpfm0502_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holding on to the Losers: Finnish Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This explanation is consistent with the argument of Lehenkari & Perttunen (2004), & Shefrin & Statman (1985. Another reason is that, in decreasing periods, the market liquidity is very low as buyers want to buy at floor price while sellers want to sell at ceiling price.…”
Section: Prospect Variables and Investment Performancesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This explanation is consistent with the argument of Lehenkari & Perttunen (2004), & Shefrin & Statman (1985. Another reason is that, in decreasing periods, the market liquidity is very low as buyers want to buy at floor price while sellers want to sell at ceiling price.…”
Section: Prospect Variables and Investment Performancesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Regret is an emotion that occurs after people make mistakes. Investors avoid regret by refusing to sell decreasing shares and willing to sell increasing ones (Fogel & Berry, 2006;Lehenkari & Perttunen, 2004). Regret aversion is the tendency to avoid actions that could create discomfort over prior decisions, even though those actions may be in the individual's best interest.…”
Section: Prospect Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a loss coming after prior gain is proved less painful than usual while a loss arriving after a loss seems to be more painful than usual (Barberis & Huang, 2001). In addition, Lehenkari and Perttunen (2004) find that both positive and negative returns in the past can boost the negative relationship between the selling trend and capital losses of investors, suggesting that investors are loss averse. Risk aversion can be understood as a common behavior of investor, nevertheless it may result in bad decision affecting investor's wealth (Odean, 1998).…”
Section: Prospect Theorymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…They argue that people may monitor their finances more often in a rising market because they believe that they have to act sooner in a rising market than in a falling market. Jung Grant et al point out that investors tend to hold on to falling stocks for too long, and sell rising stocks too soona phenomenon known as 'the disposition effect' (e.g., Lehenkari & Perttunen, 2004;Odean, 1998;Shefrin & Statman, 1985). One explanation for the disposition effect is that people take a short-term outlook in a rising market (as they feel like they need to act sooner), and a longer-term outlook in a falling market (as they feel like they have to wait until the market is rising again, before they act).…”
Section: Factors That May Influence When People Monitor Their Financesmentioning
confidence: 99%