2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2011.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hölder estimates for singular non-local parabolic equations

Abstract: In this paper, we establish local Hölder estimate for non-negative solutions of the singular equation (M.P) below, for m in the range of exponents ( n−2σ n+2σ , 1). Since we have trouble in finding the local energy inequality of v directly. we use the fact that the operator (−△) σ can be thought as the normal derivative of some extension v * of v to the upper half space, [CS], i.e., v is regarded as boundary value of v * the solution of some local extension problem. Therefore, the local Hölder estimate of v ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is very peculiar that the solution becomes identically zero in finite time. This is the so-called finite-time extinction phenomenon which is typical of some ranges of fast diffusion, see [39] for standard diffusion and [19,26] for fractional diffusion.…”
Section: Existence Of a Positive Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is very peculiar that the solution becomes identically zero in finite time. This is the so-called finite-time extinction phenomenon which is typical of some ranges of fast diffusion, see [39] for standard diffusion and [19,26] for fractional diffusion.…”
Section: Existence Of a Positive Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main technical novelty with respect to that paper is that, instead of the quadratic energies that were used there, which coincide with the ones which are adequate to treat linear problems, here we need to use a "nonlinear" energy adapted to β, since in our case β ′ (0) = 0. When L = (−∆) σ/2 and β is a power, this energy coincides with the one used in [12]. Let us notice however that our treatment of the energy differs from the one therein, which is what allows us to consider sign changing solutions.…”
Section: Outline Of the Regularity Proofmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…By an argument similar to the Lemma 4.2 of [KL2], we have the following lemma Lemma 3.6. If (3.16) is violated, then there exists a time level…”
Section: The Second Alternativementioning
confidence: 95%