“…In turn, by [10, Theorem 3.2], for every x ∈ K, the set-valued mapping X has the Aubin property relative to K at x for any element belonging to X (x) (see [11] for the definition of the Aubin property). Even more, in the light of [11,Theorems 9.38 and 9.30] being X outer semicontinuous and locally bounded at x relative to K, for every x ∈ K, X is Lipschitz continuous (see [11] for the definition of the Lipschitz continuity in the context of set-valued mappings) on a neighborhood of x relative to K. Therefore, in view of [7,Theorem 3.3], for every x ∈ K, there exist μ > 0 and a neighborhood V of x such that, for every y, z…”